Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Very High Graphics Setting: Who is this for, NASA computers?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Very High Graphics Setting: Who is this for, NASA computers?

BlackSpin's Avatar


BlackSpin
08.13.2013 , 07:27 PM | #81
yeah... and...?
Quote: Originally Posted by Pagy View Post
raid 0 a ssd? lol

MajikMyst's Avatar


MajikMyst
08.13.2013 , 08:21 PM | #82
Quote: Originally Posted by Caelrie View Post
Wow.. That is going to leave a mark!!

Never mess with facts!!
Who is the more foolish? The fool or the fool that follows him?

[.] Lost but never forgotten!! 12-01-2011 R.I.P.

MajikMyst's Avatar


MajikMyst
08.13.2013 , 08:25 PM | #83
Quote: Originally Posted by Kilora View Post
http://www.techspot.com/review/603-b...ds/page12.html

Look, I can show links too! This one, however, has 12 pages of various benchmarks, not just one.
Your link is actually over a year old and actually useless.. Video game are actually the worst way to benchmark a video card.. Many game makers design their games around one video card maker or another.. You either see the nVidia logo at the start or the ATI logo.. The game engines for those games are streamlined for the respective drivers.. So even if a card has better specs, it will most likely perform worse than the card the game was meant to be played on..

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

This link is current as of todays date.. Not to mention that all the cards are tested using unbiased software.. There is no streamlining here.. So cards that are better will reflect that.. No helpful coding in the engine specifically designed for a specific set of drivers.. Sites that use games to benchmark cards are actually useless.. They don't give an honest representation of the performance of any card.. Good or bad..
Who is the more foolish? The fool or the fool that follows him?

[.] Lost but never forgotten!! 12-01-2011 R.I.P.

MajikMyst's Avatar


MajikMyst
08.13.2013 , 08:44 PM | #84
Quote: Originally Posted by Kilora View Post
Funny, if you read my entire post I was specifically talking about when the cards came out.
Funny.. If you actually read your link none of the new cards from ATI or Nvidia are ever mentioned or in their benchmark listings..

Do you really think the GTX 680 is the current card for Nvidia??
Who is the more foolish? The fool or the fool that follows him?

[.] Lost but never forgotten!! 12-01-2011 R.I.P.

Smuglebunny's Avatar


Smuglebunny
08.13.2013 , 10:01 PM | #85
I'm a computer technician. Im A+, Network + and security+ certified. 10+ years of experience.

nVidia and Intel is BEYOND superior to AMD.

AMD is a failure company. I would NEVER EVER EVER buy a product from them.

Second, Im playing on nearly high settings on a 4 year old laptop. And I can set graphics to high and never fall under 10fps.

2.4ghz core2duo, 6GB ram, 5400rpm laptop HDD, nVidia GeForce 9600m GT w/512mb
http://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?t=670603

no issues.

Don't buy AMD anything. They fail more often and are not as powerful or as fast as Intel or nVidia products.
They are cheaper though.

Toweleeeie's Avatar


Toweleeeie
08.13.2013 , 11:46 PM | #86
That unparking cores thing really helps a lot btw. I would give that a try OP. it increase my FPS by 20 on fleet. It fluctuates from 60 (GTN) to over 100 FPS now. I would also try turning off class symbols and nameplate scaling. Turn off AA in game and us the Nvidia control panel to adjust it.
I like turtles

BaronV's Avatar


BaronV
08.14.2013 , 12:52 AM | #87
Quote: Originally Posted by AlienEyeTX View Post
nvidia cards never run well. There's your issue.
BLASPHEMY!!!!

My Kepler GPU will kick your ATi into the dirt and then sit on it
I used to be a Jedi like you - until I took a blaster bolt to the knee

BaronV's Avatar


BaronV
08.14.2013 , 12:56 AM | #88
Quote: Originally Posted by Smuglebunny View Post

Don't buy AMD anything. They fail more often and are not as powerful or as fast as Intel or nVidia products.
They are cheaper though.
That said its important to keep Intel and nVidia on their toes with competition. They are becoming quite arrogant and their prices are becoming rather exorbitant...
I used to be a Jedi like you - until I took a blaster bolt to the knee

BaronV's Avatar


BaronV
08.14.2013 , 12:57 AM | #89
Also to the OP, does running Kerbal Space Program qualify my PC as a NASA computer? I mean I run SWTOR on max settings without any hiccups after all...
I used to be a Jedi like you - until I took a blaster bolt to the knee

XisscVekno's Avatar


XisscVekno
08.14.2013 , 01:37 AM | #90
Quote: Originally Posted by philrowen View Post
It's become pretty clear this game is a crapshoot, apparently. I ve been playing SWTOR since launch on a system I built two years ago for ~$700 containing a Radeon 6950, i5 2500k, a damn Biostar motherboard and 8gb of 1600 RAM, and I have always played with max settings and have never had any technical issues aside from slow loads when I have too many browser tabs open or something. AND I've moved four times covering many thousands of miles and had a truly terrible ISP for a few months; it was still fine.

And yet people come in here with Haswell chips and video cards two generations newer than mine and the game runs like crap. Not sure if anything we have to say will be of any help.
This game has always ran like crap on new comupters. The closer it is to top of the line the worst this game seems to run, or the more you have to tweek it. It's kinda sad really that we have to do this much work to play a game on a machine that should have little to no issues at all.
Not all things in life are free,
and freedom has the highest cost of them all.
Remember those who gave, so you could enjoy what others do not.