Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Selecting need for loot


BaronV's Avatar


BaronV
03.20.2013 , 11:08 AM | #441
Quote: Originally Posted by cidbahamut View Post
Then why am I not allowed to obtain gear for a companion? What is so taboo about obtaining gear for a companion?
How about you actually READ my entire post. and READ what everyone else here has been saying???

Nobody is saying that you cant get loot for your companion. What we are saying is that you should not choose NEED for your companion without first asking the permission of the rest of the group

Nobody is stopping you from selecting GREED on ANY ITEM EVER
I used to be a Jedi like you - until I took a blaster bolt to the knee

Ratajack's Avatar


Ratajack
03.20.2013 , 11:12 AM | #442
Quote: Originally Posted by BaronV View Post
Its not about how the person uses it - its about how the person OBTAINS it!!

When you click need for your comp - knowing full well that the social convention is need for your character only; then you are STEALING the item. You are denying your other group members a fair chance at gaining the item.

If you clicked need after asking "Can I take this item for my comp?' and people said "sure" then that is perfectly fine.

The point is when you click Need - You automatically deny everyone who clicked Greed the chance to get the item So if you click need when others thought you would chose greed (since you dont need that loot for your own char) you are denying them their fair chance getting the item.

The pro "need whenever i please" people keep trying to spin this as saying that people are telling them they have no right to the loot if they cant use it. that is completely false. They have a right to an equal chance to the loot. not a right to ninja-grab it.
That is exactly what people are being told. A scoundrel healer and vanguard DPS are in a group. A defense chest piece with aim drops. The vanguard wants it and rolls need. Are you going to tell me that the group isn't going to tell the scoundrel he has no right to roll need since his CHARACTER uses cunning?

BaronV's Avatar


BaronV
03.20.2013 , 11:14 AM | #443
Quote: Originally Posted by Ratajack View Post
One of the areas we disagree is when it comes to denying a player the option to roll need for his companion if someone wants it for their character. To me it is every bit as selfish for a player to tell someone that they cannot have a chance to win that aim chest piece with defense because the vanguard DPS might want to tank, or that I cannot have a chance to win that cunning chest piece for risha because the gunslinger wants it.

You may not agree with me, but that is the way I see it. In both situations, one player is being given a higher chance to profit than another when all contributed. In the case of the player who bucks "social convention" his need roll trumps all the greed rolls of those players who choose to follow "social convention". In the case of the character before the companion, the character's need roll trumps the roll of the player who wants it for his companion as that player is only permitted to roll greed.
okay... I always need credits. So everytime I group with you I will just select need on everything kay?
I used to be a Jedi like you - until I took a blaster bolt to the knee

Ratajack's Avatar


Ratajack
03.20.2013 , 11:15 AM | #444
Quote: Originally Posted by shadowrouge View Post
Yes it is. So there for HE should have informed the group that he would be rolling on ANYTHING he could use for his companion. Lack of communication is the number one problem. You can't BLAME the other members of the group and NOT blame the OP. Defending his stance is one thing. Defending the OPs lack on no communicating is saying its ok to act as you will and not expect the rest of the group to not become upset.

He is at fault for not speaking up how he intends to roll. Its the groups fault for not explaining the loot rules it wished to use. So if your going to blame the group for NOT explaining the loot rules you have to blame the OP for not speaking up about how he rolls loots.
I did not men to imply that the OP had no responsibility to try to set ground rules, or that the OP had no share of the blame. My only intent was to point out that the OP did not deserve the entire blame. Both sides need to shoulder their share of blame for the lack of communication. I have said the GROUP should establish rules before the run.

cidbahamut's Avatar


cidbahamut
03.20.2013 , 11:18 AM | #445
Quote: Originally Posted by ScarletBlaze View Post
Your failure is failing to communicate what you were going to do in the group. You should have told the group upfront beforehand not after you did it.
You are incorrect in your assumptions. I hope you feel foolish for making baseless accusations of the guy who hits "pass" on all the loot.

BaronV's Avatar


BaronV
03.20.2013 , 11:20 AM | #446
Quote: Originally Posted by Ratajack View Post
That is exactly what people are being told. A scoundrel healer and vanguard DPS are in a group. A defense chest piece with aim drops. The vanguard wants it and rolls need. Are you going to tell me that the group isn't going to tell the scoundrel he has no right to roll need since his CHARACTER uses cunning?
an equal chance to the loot is selecting greed.

Selecting need invalidates the roll of everyone who selected greed - therefore selecting Need is NOT giving the others an equal chance to the loot.

Therefore NEED should only be used in a manner accepted by the entire group - which when is not stated is fair to assume that it is the social convention.

It is no different that queueing up at the checkout counter of your local supermarket. Why dont you just cut right into the front past the 80 year old lady?

You dont have to agree with it, but that is how the majority view this issue. That is the very definition of "social convention"
I used to be a Jedi like you - until I took a blaster bolt to the knee

Ratajack's Avatar


Ratajack
03.20.2013 , 11:21 AM | #447
Quote: Originally Posted by Emencie View Post
you are completely able to obtain gear for your companion. People do it all the time and no one has a problem with it...

However,
a team consisting of IA,BH,SI,SW
The group as a whole adheres to the social norm rule of "greed if it isn't an upgrade for your character."
If a Strength item drops and the SW does not need it for his character, Everyone will hit greed.
If a Willpower item drops and the SI does not need it for his character, Everyone will hit greed.
If a cunning item drops and the IA does not need it for his character, Everyone will hit greed.
If an Aim item drops and the BH does not need it for his character, Everyone will hit greed.
This is established by the rule the party is adhering to.

So when the Strength item drops and the SW has no need for it Everyone rolls greed, but if the IA rolls need, and especially last. He knows without a doubt he will get that Item. Every single one of those classes has a strength based companion. and every single one of them may want that gear for their companion. but since the group rule said greed for companions, they did, and so were cheated out of that item by the one person who used a false pretense to get a 100% chance at loot. This pisses people off and kicks happen.

However if the Strength item drops and the SW has no need for it Everyone rolls greed, but the IA says "I really need that for my tank companion. Can I roll need?" There would be no problem at all.

It's not about what you use the gear for. It's about how you obtain the gear.
Please clarify for me as to whether the the social norm of greed if it isn't an upgrade for your character was discussed and agreed upon before the start of the run, or if some members of the group simply assume that will be the rule.

ScarletBlaze's Avatar


ScarletBlaze
03.20.2013 , 11:22 AM | #448
Quote: Originally Posted by cidbahamut View Post
You are incorrect in your assumptions. I hope you feel foolish for making baseless accusations of the guy who hits "pass" on all the loot.
Passing on all the loot still doesn't negate the idea of having to talk to the group beforehand. There would not be any problems if the OP would have talked to the group beforehand and they agree. Failure to communicate to the group beforehand is the problem. If you don't take the time to talk to the group then expect the group to kick .

I rarely select greed or need but if I am going to select need for a companion I will talk to the group beforehand, which is something the OP didn't do and then wants to complain they were upset about it. Of course they are going to be upset if you don't speak to them beforehand.
A southern girl is a girl who knows full well that she can open a door for herself but prefers for the gentleman to do it because it demonstrates a sense of respect. Guild Roleplays: http://republicexplorerscorp.enjin.com/activity
Referral Link: http://www.swtor.com/r/vLlZlR

Lostpenguins's Avatar


Lostpenguins
03.20.2013 , 11:22 AM | #449
Quote: Originally Posted by cidbahamut View Post
Then why am I not allowed to obtain gear for a companion? What is so taboo about obtaining gear for a companion?
It's already been explained why it's a social taboo. Social taboos exists because the majority find it taboo within the context that the community exists in. There's no way you're going to convince the majority.

However, now that you know what the majority feel, you just need to accept that you will either follow in suit or not follow and get ostracized. And if you choose to not follow suit because you feel you're making a statement against some general rule of thumb that you feel is bad, feel free too. And you'll continue to get kicked from groups and BW (and any other company that hosts an MMO that you go to) will continue to shrug their shoulders at you.

So, are you done now?

BaronV's Avatar


BaronV
03.20.2013 , 11:24 AM | #450
Quote: Originally Posted by cidbahamut View Post
You are incorrect in your assumptions. I hope you feel foolish for making baseless accusations of the guy who hits "pass" on all the loot.
ROFL just what are you on about?? PASS means "I dont want this item"

just jumping in on page 46 and randomly spout rubbish.. sounds to me like you just trying to be a conflict instigator
I used to be a Jedi like you - until I took a blaster bolt to the knee