Smash isn't that bad
Smash isn't that bad
|
Washingtoon |
|
||||||
|
Eidalon |
|
||||||
|
Washingtoon |
|
||||||
|
Eidalon |
|
||||||
|
overkillss |
|
||||||
|
antiheroxi |
|
||||||
|
Aetideus |
|
||||||
|
Never_Hesitate |
|
||||||
|
Technohic |
|
||||||
You are about to leave this website...
This page is not meant to keep you from following the link you've clicked on. It is just a warning that you are about to leave this website. To go to this page, click the link below.
If you do not wish to follow this link, simply
close this message.
The statements and opinions expressed on these websites are solely those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, nor are they endorsed by Bioware, LucasArts, and its licensors do not guarantee the accuracy of, and are in no way responsible for any content on these websites.
though i've loved it. I'm reading about smashmonkeys but after playing 10 wz in a row I see more then 2 smashers in about 1 max 2 whereas I tend to see 4 sorc in 6-7 out of 10 and stun, stun, stun
this is why I stopped to play with vigilance tree the first place
no matter how good your team was 

