Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Poll: How many WZ/FP do you feel is enough per-week for F2P players?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Poll: How many WZ/FP do you feel is enough per-week for F2P players?

TheBetty's Avatar


TheBetty
10.17.2012 , 09:58 PM | #31
3 is enough. For the purpose that it is playing it's enough. It's all about teasing these f2p players into subscribing so they can have the full experience.
If force choking Jawas is wrong, I don't want to be right.

Stenrik's Avatar


Stenrik
10.17.2012 , 10:00 PM | #32
I think 7. It might be an incentive for people to try to do their daily when leveling, assuming a win every time. Of course, since they won't win every match, it might make them more likely to be wanting more.

It's also just simpler and easier to keep track of.

BogyOne's Avatar


BogyOne
10.17.2012 , 11:25 PM | #33
I think that poll should start from 0 and have 1 and 2. As it is it does not give you the full picture what players think, you're just cutting off players who do not want any F2P in WZ assuming they "feel 3 WZ is enough". You could also see how many subbers do not want F2P interfering with their gameplay at all.

I think that 3 is good to give a taste of subscription. I have time to make 1 PvP daily per day and 5 to 8 per week (no weekends). If F2P players want more than me then they can subscribe, it is not a fortune.

RSLeMire's Avatar


RSLeMire
10.18.2012 , 10:17 AM | #34
Quote: Originally Posted by BlueRahja View Post
There was no option to say zero. If you want full access, subscribe.
I do not subscribe to your train of thought... I choose ZERO. I do not want F2P at all in SWTOR. I have been paying $15 a month for well over a decade and believe that is the format that should be used. people like you are the reason we have idiots in office in America (not assuming that you are American, I am mearly saying your "you have to choose one or the other" attitude is flawed) I refuse to pick between the puppet on the left or the puppet on the right (and btw I fought for my right to NOT VOTE in Iraq with the 101st ABN in the worst part of the war in 06 in the Sunni Triangle Of Death as an Infantryman) and I surely will not pretend that I am ok with F2P players having a single WZ or FP or Op ever. I do not want to be grouped with anyone who is not paying the sub EVER. if that throws off your biased little poll so be it.
"Whatever our fate, let us meet it as Jedi."

Iggster's Avatar


Iggster
10.18.2012 , 10:36 AM | #35
Quote: Originally Posted by Coldin View Post
Actually. I don't think it should be on a per-week basis at all.

It should be 2 warzones per day. That encourages F2P players to log in every day, and encourages them to win their matches since they can complete the daily with two wins. Then if they don't manage to win, they have the extra incentive to buy more access, but they still get the opportunity to complete the daily and weekly later in the week.
Two wins daily? The only on I get is to play two games. Is the win on specifically for 50's?

BlueRahja's Avatar


BlueRahja
10.18.2012 , 11:39 AM | #36
Quote: Originally Posted by RSLeMire View Post
people like you are the reason we have idiots in office in America
People like me? I said 1 thing. You have no idea what people like me are like. Take your political rhetoric and your "I was in the military so you have to listen to me" stuff somewhere else and stay on topic. All I was saying is, there is plenty for free already. Honestly, I would prefer they only give access to one HM, like BT or Esseles, but that wasn't part of the poll now was it? But if you give unlimited access to those HM's at least the queues will still pop, and everyone can play, and maybe people will think "hmmm, I should subscribe and get them all" Because if you want full access....subscribe.
'"\\=<<>>=//"'
"There's no use running, you'll only die tired."

hages's Avatar


hages
10.18.2012 , 11:41 AM | #37
3 will do..u wand more? pay :-)
nothings as good as an cold cold beer...and swtor to play drunk

hages's Avatar


hages
10.18.2012 , 11:45 AM | #38
Quote: Originally Posted by RSLeMire View Post
I do not subscribe to your train of thought... I choose ZERO. I do not want F2P at all in SWTOR. I have been paying $15 a month for well over a decade and believe that is the format that should be used. people like you are the reason we have idiots in office in America (not assuming that you are American, I am mearly saying your "you have to choose one or the other" attitude is flawed) I refuse to pick between the puppet on the left or the puppet on the right (and btw I fought for my right to NOT VOTE in Iraq with the 101st ABN in the worst part of the war in 06 in the Sunni Triangle Of Death as an Infantryman) and I surely will not pretend that I am ok with F2P players having a single WZ or FP or Op ever. I do not want to be grouped with anyone who is not paying the sub EVER. if that throws off your biased little poll so be it.
U have a serious problem man? what is this all about? what has wz to do with iraq? anyway. if u do not wanna team u with a f2p player fine.but i find youre reaction a bit crasy tbh.
nothings as good as an cold cold beer...and swtor to play drunk

TUXs's Avatar


TUXs
10.18.2012 , 11:49 AM | #39
10+!!! Just minimize/eliminate any reward from them.
All warfare is based on deception If his forces are united, separate them If you are far from the enemy, make him believe you are near A leader leads by example not by force
My referral code: here What you get: here (1 FREE transfer 7-day FREE sub FREE Jumpstart and Preferred Bundles)

Miukie's Avatar


Miukie
10.18.2012 , 11:55 AM | #40
3 is more than enough.