This game could learn from SWG

i will spin anything to make people like you feel wrong :P or rather people like Van dickus who if i remember correctly already told to leave the thread before :P

Do you even see how posts like these make you look about 10 or 12.. You are so arrogant that you aren't even worth responding to.. You just can't handle the fact that not everyone thinks as you.. Welcome to life and reality.. We are all entitled to our own opinions.. That includes everyone else..

All have to agree that implementing some sucsessful features from SWG would increase the gameplay.

No they don't have to agree on this. Shocker

Furthermore many people disagree about what were the "successful" features of SWG. I for one don't like the idea of combat pets. Totally changes the game's balance. This wasn't an issue in SWG, because frankly the game was not built to be a balanced PvE/PvP competitive MMO. It was a sandbox MMO.

Lastly implementing anything from SWG will take resources away from the development of something else, like a GW2 RvRvR system, or a new operation. So people may disagree on whether something from SWG warrants the same priority as cross server queues or server transfers. If some features from SWG are implemented in exchange for some of these other features, the total number of players might decrease rather than increase.

Lastly implementing anything from SWG will take resources away from the development of something else, like a GW2 RvRvR system, or a new operation. So people may disagree on whether something from SWG warrants the same priority as cross server queues or server transfers. If some features from SWG are implemented in exchange for some of these other features, the total number of players might decrease rather than increase.

and it just had to be vandick again. alright then ill tell you what for example , multi-crew vehicles. there , 1 feature just for you which for certain would increase the joy / gameplay value. and i dont want to hear anymore from you LOL

TBF there's no evidence they are developing a RvRvR system (or even a RvR system).

All we have evidence for is the Cashshop, a couple of new on-the-rail missions and a flashpoint or two (and then whatever Makeb end up being whenever Makeb end up appearing).

Plus in all honesty with the SSSP having ran for at least 9 months now and they still can't talk about any of it, I can't see RvR appearing in SWTOR till 2014 at the earliest.




The problems is more flashpoints aren't going to turn SWTOR around.......... they need to give the game breadth and depth instead.

No they don't have to agree on this. Shocker

Furthermore many people disagree about what were the "successful" features of SWG. I for one don't like the idea of combat pets. Totally changes the game's balance. This wasn't an issue in SWG, because frankly the game was not built to be a balanced PvE/PvP competitive MMO. It was a sandbox MMO.

Lastly implementing anything from SWG will take resources away from the development of something else, like a GW2 RvRvR system, or a new operation. So people may disagree on whether something from SWG warrants the same priority as cross server queues or server transfers. If some features from SWG are implemented in exchange for some of these other features, the total number of players might decrease rather than increase.