Made it all the way to level 50 just to ened up looking like everyone else?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic
Made it all the way to level 50 just to ened up looking like everyone else?

Page 9 of 12 « First < 7 8 9 10 11 > Last »

Jorrvask

06.25.2012 , 08:19 PM \| #81	Quote
Why is there so much qq over this when 1.3 is afew hours away?

metalgearyoda

06.25.2012 , 08:19 PM \| #82	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Wolfninjajedi Well that and "why we gotta pay so much to remove mods." ah so its also a "dailies are too hard" thread. Good... Good...
Ganking leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to pvp. The Swtor forum attracts trolls because the forums are more fun than raiding dragon soul. Complaining is the new meta game.

Jenzali

06.25.2012 , 08:34 PM \| #83	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by metalgearyoda How is 12 bonus stam and 18 bonus primary stat gimping yourself? Moddables = BIS Quote: Originally Posted by metalgearyoda ah so its also a "dailies are too hard" thread. Good... Good... The set bonuses are very substantial for some classes. What you are doing is arguing in favor of something that very clearly works AGAINST the intended mechanic. The mechanic itself is fine, most of us will agree on that. Even BW's addition of new armor sets proves that the non-transferable armoring set bonus is outdated. Neither am I arguing that dailies are "too hard". The problem is that looking good is the single most difficult thing in the game if you don't want to sacrifice substantial set bonuses and stats. Yes, it's harder and more tedious than the War Hero grind or the hardest operations to get Campaign Gear. Why? Because having either of those are prerequisites to being able to look how you choose. Furthermore, why would anyone bring you to an operation if they could just take someone instead who doesn't gimp themselves on purpose? Your argument really doesn't make sense from any point of view. Quote: Why is there so much qq over this when 1.3 is afew hours away? You still can't transfer Battlemaster/Tionese/Columi/Rakata set bonuses in 1.3.
Dashto Vant - Arsenal Mercenary - The most dashing bounty hunter in the galaxy.

mattgyver

06.25.2012 , 09:20 PM \| #84	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by metalgearyoda appearance tabs are cop outs. This games system is significantly better. Tact on solutions ftl. cop outs! lol I tell ya, you need to use a lil elbow grease, that's what is wrong with these youngsters these days. You have to earn your appearance, and in the old days we actually wore what we appeared to wear! None of these fancy appearance tabs

Ashlian

06.25.2012 , 09:39 PM \| #85	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by mattgyver cop outs! lol I tell ya, you need to use a lil elbow grease, that's what is wrong with these youngsters these days. You have to earn your appearance, and in the old days we actually wore what we appeared to wear! None of these fancy appearance tabs Hmmm.....yes, when I dyed my cleric's plate to the exact shade of the Hate class armor, who could tell I wasn't wearing it? I mean, I HAD a full set of Hate armor, but by that point it was obsolete.....just such a pretty shade of purple. I enjoyed being able to have the LOOK of the Hate armor without losing the stats of the much better armor I'd gotten since I'd abandoned it. And in EQ2, they finally, finally gave us appearance tabs though never dyes. And my fury could wear something besides fricking green toned armor, because good grief, who decides that healer classes have to wear green? I HATE green. Way back in the good old days. It's simple. One still has to get the armor one wants for the stats. You have to EARN IT. Then you have to get the armor you want for looks one way or the other, whether it goes on an appearance tab or not. You have to EARN IT. It doesn't just magically appear on your appearance tab, you still have to get it. How anyone can think that someone putting something they have EARNED in an appearance tab isn't a valid method of demonstrating their achievement is beyond me. In EQ2, when you examined someone you saw BOTH sets of gear. If you wanted to see what someone was using beyond their appearance, you looked. As it is, in this game you have no idea how someone has modded their gear, a level 50 in level 11 augmented drelliad smuggler gear can have full campaign. You have to EXAMINE THEM. So how, exactly, is an appearance tab any different? I fail to understand the logic. Because there IS no logic to it.

mattgyver

06.25.2012 , 09:48 PM \| #86	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Ashlian Hmmm.....yes, when I dyed my cleric's plate to the exact shade of the Hate class armor, who could tell I wasn't wearing it? I mean, I HAD a full set of Hate armor, but by that point it was obsolete.....just such a pretty shade of purple. I enjoyed being able to have the LOOK of the Hate armor without losing the stats of the much better armor I'd gotten since I'd abandoned it. And in EQ2, they finally, finally gave us appearance tabs though never dyes. And my fury could wear something besides fricking green toned armor, because good grief, who decides that healer classes have to wear green? I HATE green. Way back in the good old days. It's simple. One still has to get the armor one wants for the stats. You have to EARN IT. Then you have to get the armor you want for looks one way or the other, whether it goes on an appearance tab or not. You have to EARN IT. It doesn't just magically appear on your appearance tab, you still have to get it. How anyone can think that someone putting something they have EARNED in an appearance tab isn't a valid method of demonstrating their achievement is beyond me. In EQ2, when you examined someone you saw BOTH sets of gear. If you wanted to see what someone was using beyond their appearance, you looked. As it is, in this game you have no idea how someone has modded their gear, a level 50 in level 11 augmented drelliad smuggler gear can have full campaign. You have to EXAMINE THEM. So how, exactly, is an appearance tab any different? I fail to understand the logic. Because there IS no logic to it. There's no good argument against appearance tabs. It's a favorite cause of the status quo police.

Karkais

08.13.2012 , 03:26 AM \| #87	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Jorrvask Why is there so much qq over this when 1.3 is afew hours away? Because being able to augment existing orange gear doesnt change the fact that inquisitors get basically NONE goodlooking orange gear in the FIRST place? Yeah I necroed, deal with it. The appearance issue is one of the two things that piss me off the most in this game.
"What is a Sith? Over time, the beliefs have changed, but one constant has remained. The imposition of one's will on the force, on the environment surrounding one, on the galaxy itself." - Darth Wyyrlok III

Toweleeeie

08.13.2012 , 03:31 AM \| #88	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Karkais Because being able to augment existing orange gear doesnt change the fact that inquisitors get basically NONE goodlooking orange gear in the FIRST place? Yeah I necroed, deal with it. The appearance issue is one of the two things that piss me off the most in this game. Is the other big butt in robes? Because AMEN BROTHER!
I like turtles

Kaisernick

08.13.2012 , 03:49 AM \| #89	Quote
i have gotten almost all my Bm armor and ripped the mods out of them, granted its still expensive and bioware should lower the price again but the end game armor looks awful even worse than wows TBH

NoaFlux

08.13.2012 , 04:18 PM \| #90	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by mattgyver cop outs! lol I tell ya, you need to use a lil elbow grease, that's what is wrong with these youngsters these days. You have to earn your appearance, and in the old days we actually wore what we appeared to wear! None of these fancy appearance tabs You don't understand. My character is maxed out. I have tons of gear I like, but it's not strong enough. There are only about 4 modable pieces per class for WZ gear, and for my character there are only about 6 decent looking modable chest pieces. When you add in the fact that you can't change the color (only match) that causes a lot of problems. I'm not too worried about this anymore though, I'm sure cosmetics will be a huge part of P2P!

Page 9 of 12 « First < 7 8 9 10 11 > Last »

STAR WARS: The Old Republic

LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

You are about to leave this website...

This page is not meant to keep you from following the link you've clicked on. It is just a warning that you are about to leave this website. To go to this page, click the link below.

If you do not wish to follow this link, simply
close this message.

The statements and opinions expressed on these websites are solely those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, nor are they endorsed by Bioware, LucasArts, and its licensors do not guarantee the accuracy of, and are in no way responsible for any content on these websites.

Close Continue