Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Next time EA announces number of subs...

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Next time EA announces number of subs...

Goretzu's Avatar


Goretzu
06.25.2012 , 11:03 AM | #101
Quote: Originally Posted by PainOfDemise View Post
As long as my server stays populated, I could care less how many active subscriptions there are. After 1.3 through, I believe they will start to rise again anyway.
I think you mean you couldn't care less.

However actually you could, because unless there's enough subs SWTOR won't get developement or expansions....... so maybe you're elegantly stating that?
Real Star Wars space combat please, not Star Wars Fox! Maybe some PvP and flight too?
Goretzu's Law: As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving "Entitled" approaches 1

Goretzu's Avatar


Goretzu
06.25.2012 , 11:05 AM | #102
Quote: Originally Posted by Jederix View Post
The argument was whether or not they counted free trials. Not how they charge players in Asia (which is well known by just about everyone). They don't count free trials. Bioware will, most likely, not count them either.
Every MMORPG counts free trials and free time........ why would SWTOR not?
Real Star Wars space combat please, not Star Wars Fox! Maybe some PvP and flight too?
Goretzu's Law: As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving "Entitled" approaches 1

Kharnis's Avatar


Kharnis
06.25.2012 , 11:13 AM | #103
Quote: Originally Posted by Goretzu View Post
Every MMORPG counts free trials and free time........ why would SWTOR not?
No. They don't. Free trials do not contribute to any revenues. Counting them could be seen as deliberately misleading investors concerning company fortunes. In this day and age, after the way Enron and its executives were dragged through a years-long investigation and trials that resulted in the bankrupcy of the corporation, do you really think any of the execs in EA is willing to risk that for a game that isn't even in their top five revenue generators?
Proud member of "The Loose Canons" Cartel.
Fan Fics
Completed:
Ongoing:

Goretzu's Avatar


Goretzu
06.25.2012 , 11:21 AM | #104
Quote: Originally Posted by MaximusRex View Post
Since they are not PAYING subs, counting them as subs in a financial report would give a false reading of the health of the game which would be fraud for a publicly traded company to do. Haters are obviously beginning their spin by suggesting that EA is going to break Federal Law over a game they have already declared as not being in their top 10.
No it wouldn't be fraud, it's standard MMORPG practice.

Nothing ever refers to "paying accounts" only active/open accounts (which can include all manner of things that aren't paying subs).
Real Star Wars space combat please, not Star Wars Fox! Maybe some PvP and flight too?
Goretzu's Law: As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving "Entitled" approaches 1

Goretzu's Avatar


Goretzu
06.25.2012 , 11:26 AM | #105
Quote: Originally Posted by Kharnis View Post
No. They don't. Free trials do not contribute to any revenues. Counting them could be seen as deliberately misleading investors concerning company fortunes. In this day and age, after the way Enron and its executives were dragged through a years-long investigation and trials that resulted in the bankrupcy of the corporation, do you really think any of the execs in EA is willing to risk that for a game that isn't even in their top five revenue generators?
Quote:
Cooking the Stats

It is worth pointing out that there is no way to obtain irrefutable accurate information on subscribers. Only the companies responsible for the games have access to the statistics and their interpretation of an active account may be different from yours. The majority count anyone who is paying for a subscription, anyone in a free trial period or anyone who has been active on an account within the last month. They make no distinction for users with multiple accounts so they will be counted separately. Clearly the figures will not be representative of the number of users you can expect to find online within a game world at any given time – that number will be much lower.

http://www.alteredgamer.com/pc-gamin...r-populations/
The reason they count all those is because they can. Perfectly legitimatedly and legally. This isn't a secret, it's just how things are done and have been done for a very long time now.


It may be Bioware don't count some of the above, but there's no reason for them not to do so.
Real Star Wars space combat please, not Star Wars Fox! Maybe some PvP and flight too?
Goretzu's Law: As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving "Entitled" approaches 1

Kharnis's Avatar


Kharnis
06.25.2012 , 11:43 AM | #106
Quote: Originally Posted by Goretzu View Post
The reason they count all those is because they can. Perfectly legitimatedly and legally. This isn't a secret, it's just how things are done and have been done for a very long time now.


It may be Bioware don't count some of the above, but there's no reason for them not to do so.
So, your evidence and support for your argument is a blog from someone who doesn't back up his statement of "anyone in a free trial period" with any kind of data or facts?

Look, I'm not asking you to take EA's word on faith. I'm asking you to use logic. If a company is going to publicly declare what their revenue generators are, do you really think that they are going to play fast and loose with the facts in this day and age of SEC hyper-oversight and activist investors? And do you really think they're going to do that for a game that isn't their number one revenue generator? Do you really think they're going to want to risk possible litigation, criminal charges, and corporation bankrupcy just to inflate the numbers of something that isn't in their top five money making ventures?

Or do you think they're going to play it safe and not take that kind of chance?
Proud member of "The Loose Canons" Cartel.
Fan Fics
Completed:
Ongoing:

Ranid's Avatar


Ranid
06.25.2012 , 11:43 AM | #107
Quote: Originally Posted by Goretzu View Post
The reason they count all those is because they can. Perfectly legitimatedly and legally. This isn't a secret, it's just how things are done and have been done for a very long time now.


It may be Bioware don't count some of the above, but there's no reason for them not to do so.
So all those play for free subscriptions in July will count too, even though they do not generate revenue?
***
Organ Harvester: "Are you deaf? I asked for Iridonian hearts! Not Rodian, Not Ithorian! Iridonian!"
Organ Harvester: "What do you want me to do, put them back?"

MasterKayote's Avatar


MasterKayote
06.25.2012 , 11:46 AM | #108
Quote: Originally Posted by Goretzu View Post
The reason they count all those is because they can. Perfectly legitimatedly and legally. This isn't a secret, it's just how things are done and have been done for a very long time now.


It may be Bioware don't count some of the above, but there's no reason for them not to do so.
What does it even matter how much the numbers are skewed? What ever they do or dont count is irrelevent. Its not like that number means anything to us. All we csre about is wether it goes up or down. Up = good, Down= bad. Furthermore, we just use that number to compare how the game is doing in proportion to others who ALSO skew the numbers just the same. So really, arguing on the accuracy of those announcements is pointless.

Arlbo_Nabbins's Avatar


Arlbo_Nabbins
06.25.2012 , 11:49 AM | #109
Quote: Originally Posted by Ranid View Post
So all those play for free subscriptions in July will count too, even though they do not generate revenue?
If the numbers reported are higher than about 400K I am sure that is what some will claim.

jgelling's Avatar


jgelling
06.25.2012 , 11:50 AM | #110
Quote: Originally Posted by Ranid View Post
So all those play for free subscriptions in July will count too, even though they do not generate revenue?
Well, they'll be sure to mention the free subs, and I hope it's a big hit. But they'll be releasing the figures during an earnings call, and there's no way they'll get away with not giving an actual figure.