Thank you for making PvP Worse

All Warzones reward participation, pre-today's patch, post today's patch, win or lose.

The only difference between yesterday and today is 99 commendations.

Your entire point that this is a "change" which will "promote cheating/AFKing" is 100% nonsensical and has been disproven many times in this thread.

Again, wrong.

The change today does nothing except reward players 99 commendations a little sooner than before.

It does nothing to encourage using illegal programs which get your account banned.

You lose yet again.

So you still don't understand? The change allows the exploit. when exploits exist people use them.

So you can argue all day if your petty ego requires it. But you are never going to be 'right'.

You simply have an opinion that the exploiting will not be rampant. I am simply stating that the change allows for the exploit.

So ok someone uses this program to afk 6 warzones.... they get their 6 completions and 99 rated and regular comms.... however they contributed nothing to the warzone, and gained no medals so they get no xp, no credits, and no comms.

Net gain over 24hr period = 99 rated and regular warzone comms + EXTREME vulnerability to being detected using a third party program and banned.

99 warzone and rated warzone comms a week = 693 for both. Just enough to buy ONE piece of battlemaster equipment. Again screaming to the sky over something that is not going to give ANYONE an advantage over an ATK player.

LOL now we're adding the imaginary "cheating" argument on top of the "AFK" argument. Anyone else what to add things that were never brought up in the OP? It's "Let me sound like I know what I am talking about regardless of what the OP says Day!".

100% proven false.

Anyone using a bot program could use it yesterday, match after match, and gain commendations. And, statistically, they would end up in winning matches at some rate, thus completing their dailies (which required WINS ONLY) using said cheating programs.

The ONLY DIFFERENCE between yesterday and today, is that the daily now completes after 6 warzones no matter the outcome instead of after "X" where "X" was a variable.

Today's patch does NOTHING WHATSOEVER to ENCOURAGE the use of a cheating program.
You have been summarily owned.

Oi... please stop misusing that term!

Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 comms. Go directly back to Intro Psychology

Hmm, yeah, not misusing it. Try Google.

Is this a six page thread about how the above note will change nothing in this game for those that care about winning, but will allow people that just want to "finish the daily" to just "finish the daily"?

Maybe we should change the daily to "Spend 2 hours logged in" so that people on low pop servers can get theirs done too. I used to "play" a game like that, it was called progressquest.

I have a question: Why would a person not interested in PVP gear/PVPing join a warzone to get a mark on a daily to gain rewards to buy said PVP gear? Beyond this, if they were here yesterday, and you hate that they do not use PVP gear, what is wrong with them having more comms to spend on said gear? Although, spending on said gear seems silly, since they didn't like it yesterday and therefore shouldn't like it today anyway. BEYOND that, doesn't this benefit you? NOW when you are paired with them, you still get a mark on your daily, and can therefore get YOUR gear faster, or whatever it is you spend said comms on. I really see no degradation to you here.

Now you've broken from the argument that players who hate or do not use gear had an Incentive based on comms and gear. Beyond that, another poster said it best with his quote on the comms math:

As you can see, mathematically the players winning still get more. Again, I do not understand why this is an issue.

You mentioned that players without expertise will now do nothing and allow the match to culminate in a loss. Please, what is the difference between being AFK and that? I would very much like to know.

I suppose, unless you can bring a valid argument against my last comment, that you must be quiet now?