Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Someone explain the LFG tool hate?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Someone explain the LFG tool hate?

Callianna's Avatar


Callianna
05.01.2012 , 08:15 AM | #71
Quote: Originally Posted by chaosdefined View Post
It's not rocket science, yet so many people fail to grasp the idea that other people aren't on as populated servers as them!

You lot seem to think that Single Server LFG uses good magic to make new players appear for low pop servers. And Cross Server uses bad magic to make players mean and nasty towards everyone.
Think most people want the option of either choosing xlfg or server lfg. No magic involved.

Cerion's Avatar


Cerion
05.01.2012 , 08:17 AM | #72
Quote: Originally Posted by Valkirus View Post
See the response Ferroz gave to this subject......

"....So... what game are you talking about where this is true?

It's certainly not WoW... you can't transfer items via cross server lfg in wow."

And the real "police" has to be BioWare. All the players can do it is report other players for suspects of being a gold farmer. And you do know players in a pug group can be kicked? I have seen this happen often in the pug raids I have done.
Sorry, I have Ferroz on ignore, so I'll have to address you. Can you not trade with other players while using LFG finder..I mean, once you're in the instance and all? I don't play WoW, so have no experience with their tool.
Good will always triumph because Evil is lazy.

Valkirus's Avatar


Valkirus
05.01.2012 , 08:18 AM | #73
Quote: Originally Posted by Callianna View Post
Being a a former wow player, it wasn't that "hardcore" raiders didn't want all players to be able to see endgame content, it was that the content was dumbed down considerably. Considering in the 25 man lfr group 1/2 of the raid can sit there not doing anything and still down the boss, that was the problem. Yes I did run a lfr in wow before I quit and it was laughable. I thought it was a good idea when they brought it up as more people would be able to see all the content but how it was implemented was terrible, I mean more than 1/2 the raid should to have to at least try lol.
Sorry, but you are exaggerating. Sure it is easier to do Dragon Soul using the LFR than the normal version. But you still need to have most of the raid group do the fights correctly. And Wiping still does occur. But what matters is you do not have to use it if you think it is too easy. It does what it is intended to do very well and is a challenge for a lot of players. Maybe not for the best ones. But they have other options .
Trust is something which is earned.

chaosdefined's Avatar


chaosdefined
05.01.2012 , 08:19 AM | #74
Quote: Originally Posted by Darkulous View Post
This reason actually holds no water with me. The second someone needs on a piece they don't need, they will get kicked. Also, if a player is a complete douchebag, they will get kicked. There is nothing holding back players to hit the "kick" button as opposed to running with people you got from the fleet. Right now players have to deal with douchebags and ninjas because nobody wants to go back to fleet and spam for another player for 1 -2 hours. Anyone who has actual extensive experience with a cross-server LFD knows that the tool MAKES players behave. Players who que in to LFD WANT to finish the Flashpoint and they won't do anything to jeapardize that from happening. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule and that is what the anti-LFDers hold on to, the exceptions.
Exactly. Currently as it is with groups, only the Group Leader can kick anyone. Which is a nightmare if they're the one ninja-ing. And I've had that had a couple of times already.

Scar's Avatar


Scar
05.01.2012 , 08:20 AM | #75
Quote: Originally Posted by chaosdefined View Post
It's not rocket science, yet so many people fail to grasp the idea that other people aren't on as populated servers as them!

You lot seem to think that Single Server LFG uses good magic to make new players appear for low pop servers. And Cross Server uses bad magic to make players mean and nasty towards everyone.
That's an oversimplification of the issue.

People are under the belief that cross server LFG's work the way they did in WoW circa WoTLK where the groups were very temporary, there wasn't much dialog, and you almost never ever saw any of those you would be put together with again. Which did nothing to add to the community feel, or individuals ability to find like minded people on a more permanent basis.

I'm actually all for LFG tools. Cross serever I would be more hesitant if they couldn't solve the having cross servers easily, and unobtrusively, added to your friends list.

But if they could solve that, have at it. In fact, it would solve a great number of issues. Mainly the ones you outlined: dead server people to get in touch with other people. To take the community from a server level, to a game level.

Having said that, there are more real pressing logistical issues for cross server lfg tools in the means that TOR is designed.

In the FP's and OP's, cross server would and/or could function exactly like WoW: everyone called to a separately created instance and you leave it and head back to your origin server.

However, the H2's and H4's not associated with instances start proposing much more interesting logistical issues. I think that's what the real issue that BW is having.

chaosdefined's Avatar


chaosdefined
05.01.2012 , 08:20 AM | #76
Quote: Originally Posted by Callianna View Post
Think most people want the option of either choosing xlfg or server lfg. No magic involved.
That's what I keep saying would be best, but the Anti-XLFG people keep saying an uncompromising no to that answer.
Funny, they complain about community and then show no compassion towards other players.

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
05.01.2012 , 08:21 AM | #77
Quote: Originally Posted by Cerion View Post
It's not about me putting them on ignore. This isn't a self-centered issue for me. It's about the health of the server, both economy and community.
Putting them on ignore is all you can actually do for the health of the game, whether you're talking about cross or single server. People are more likely to put you on ignore for spamming general if you go complaining about them.

Quote:
And why am I going to report a RMT/gold seller if I happened to be the one making the transaction, lol? I wouldn't know what was happening otherwise.

Yes they currently exist. That's like saying we shouldn't police for robbers because they're already happening. Giving them a tool to do their business more efficiently isn't smart.
Again: why are you assuming that this is going to be possible?

Cross server lfg does not in any way help RMT/gold sellers.


Quote: Originally Posted by Scar View Post
First of all "friend" is a misnomer in these games. It's more "acquaintance" or "stranger you just spent a hour with clearing out a dungeon and didn't hate."

So to answer your loaded "why would'nt you want to share your email address with your friends?" question: I wouldn't have problem with "friends". Actual friends. People I knew and trusted. And I suspect most people wouldn't.

But that's not really who we are talking about here.
If you're arguing that realid is badly implemented... well, that doesn't really have anything to do with cross server itself. The functionality is there and it's clear how the system can be well implemented (ie, take a look at the incoming battle tag system for wow)

Quote: Originally Posted by Callianna View Post
Being a a former wow player, it wasn't that "hardcore" raiders didn't want all players to be able to see endgame content, it was that the content was dumbed down considerably. Considering in the 25 man lfr group 1/2 of the raid can sit there not doing anything and still down the boss, that was the problem. Yes I did run a lfr in wow before I quit and it was laughable. I thought it was a good idea when they brought it up as more people would be able to see all the content but how it was implemented was terrible, I mean more than 1/2 the raid should to have to at least try lol.
eh, if half the raid sat there and did nothing, you didn't have enough dps to take down (for example) the tendons in the time that you had to take them out. That may no longer be the case (I haven't played wow in a bit), if you have highly overgeared people doing the content...

But that's irrelevant: if you don't want to do dumbed down content, don't do the dumbed down content. Play the content that's not dumbed down.

Valkirus's Avatar


Valkirus
05.01.2012 , 08:22 AM | #78
Quote: Originally Posted by Cerion View Post
Sorry, I have Ferroz on ignore, so I'll have to address you. Can you not trade with other players while using LFG finder..I mean, once you're in the instance and all? I don't play WoW, so have no experience with their tool.
Yes. But..not in the upcoming MOP LFR tool. They are implementing a drop and roll system similair to what TOR uses in thier Operations. Which is...no more rolling for items and no more trading of items you win. The system will roll for you. This will help with the ninjas for items and also with the wait times as some now log before they roll on a item. Making the remaining players wait the 2 mins for the roll timer to wear off.
Trust is something which is earned.

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
05.01.2012 , 08:24 AM | #79
Quote: Originally Posted by Valkirus View Post
Yes. But..not in the upcoming MOP LFR tool.
Even in the current LFG and LFR tools, you can't trade with anyone who's not on your server, other than drops that happened in that instance. So that does not, in any way, help RMT/gold sellers transfer stuff from one server to another.

Cerion's Avatar


Cerion
05.01.2012 , 08:24 AM | #80
Quote: Originally Posted by chaosdefined View Post
That's what I keep saying would be best, but the Anti-XLFG people keep saying an uncompromising no to that answer.
Funny, they complain about community and then show no compassion towards other players.
No. The way I see it, the compromise is having same-server LFG tool. You have one camp that wants no-holds-barred x-server access and another group that doesn't want any LFG tool. To me, the middle ground that best addresses all concerns is the same-server LFG tool.
Good will always triumph because Evil is lazy.