No Cross Realm LFG tool please!

Sorry my fault i did write it using the TBC anology it was about this actually

Still my point is the more convinience implemented into the game the more players will try and find loopholes for personal gain if they notice that they get rewarded from it.

Have already happened in Swtor and will keep on rising the more convinience attributes that gets implememted LFG x-server LFG X-server PvP the more people will find a way to be able to do as little as possible while reaping the best rewards.

Happened in WoW and the same are happening in this game

I don't doubt that botting and AFK is an issue in PvP. I witnessed it myself and it was very frustrating at times.

However, PvP and PvE are two totally different animals in that regard. Much easier to ID and kick botters and AFK'ers in PvE than PvP (sheer numbers and roles). If and when a LFG tool is implemented, BW should take these things in to consideration and button up the loop holes before going live (as best they can predict).

However, just because something happens in PvP doesn't mean that a tool for wide access to PvE content should be negatively impacted or disparaged..

Im fine with cross server dungeons but please...no cross server raiding thats just...no.

arathi is 15vs15 bg
just saying

Still my point is the more convinience implemented into the game the more players will try and find loopholes for personal gain if they notice that they get rewarded from it.

thats not a fair comparison because wow is a way better game.

x-server lfg is more than convience, its bloody necessary. my server has only a few people in fleet at peak time, they cant even do a WZ. so until server transfers arrive, there is nothing to do here.

inb4 "reroll" RE: sorry i already unsubbed

No, your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise: making things more convenient doesn't add more loopholes; there's no relationship between these two things: they're totally independent.

I hope server transfers help realms like yours, but I'm doubtful.

There is reason that WoW quit offering free transfers a few years back. They realized that moving a few players around is only a temporary fix because you have no way of ensuring that enough players transfer to the right realms to fix anyone's problems. There was even a post from a Blizzard CM about that if I remember correctly. They basically admitted that transfers weren't helping because the servers that players wanted to transfer to were under heavy loads and experiencing log in queues, while the servers they recommended that players transfer to were having a massive exodus of players transferring off the realm. It ended up just being a vicious cycle of transferring players in such a way that they were just chasing the low population problems from one server to the next, so to speak.

Blizzard eventually decided that the cross server LFD tool was the best way to help out the players on the low population realms because it was the only solution that didn't have dependencies on a certain number of players being distributed on specific servers. Basically, transfers are reliant on players choosing to be on the right realms in such a manner to balance population distribution. Whereas the LFD doesn't care what server a player is on because it can pull players in from all of the servers. This gave players on low pop servers access to a much larger community without dealing with the slippery slope that of server mergers.

I think eventually BioWare will make this same realization.

So you mean that between trial and error and Internet safety aswell have no relationship ?

between this game or even better yet why even have hacker conferances and competitions or user tests ?

Why do you think that most Banks and Economic facilities are so careful implemetenting convinience "new " technology even thought that convinience have existed a long time ?

Same as here convinience brings aswell more problems to the table that need to be ironed out

why do you think gamebreaking was first used not because the game had downtime but because rash inexperienced updates was released that broke the playabilty / function

No, there's no relationship between trial and error and internet safety

internet safety is a set of rules for people, particularly children, to remain safe while using the internet.

No, that's not true. There is no relatship between "more convenience" and "more problems".

trial and error is an experimental method of problem solving, repair, tuning, or obtaining knowledge.
Please read that slowly again ...veeeeeery slowly and think or how did they come to that conclussion and how that infact creates internet security?

was it the fluffy pink unicorn just appeared and made that internet security or was it trial and error?

same anology would be that you are saying there are no Beta testing other then games because it internet safety in infinite .,...

No in that case we should just stop using Antivirus and everything lets surf **** and stuff or even download keyloggers by purpose i mean what can they do ....

There actually is just that more users means more people finding stuff that have gotten overlooked that is common IT awareness