Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Upgraded my CPU and am very pleased

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Upgraded my CPU and am very pleased

Valkirus's Avatar


Valkirus
03.02.2012 , 07:51 AM | #81
Quote: Originally Posted by Mephistofilus View Post
I see two diff numbers.
Is the left the live and the right the avg. or what?
I am not sure the one in game is accurate. I have Vsnyc on and refresh rate set on my monitor to 60 hz...so it should'nt exceed 60 fps. Which is what it shows consistently in WoW. Never exceeds 60. In TOR however...it runs between 72 - 78 FPS.
Trust is something which is earned.

Valkirus's Avatar


Valkirus
03.02.2012 , 08:01 AM | #82
Quote: Originally Posted by origamikitsune View Post
To put in perspective...

i5 2.8ghz
4gb RAM
GTX 460 768mb GDDR5

I play this game in 1080p, with forced 32x AA, and all settings on high. If I turn off desktop composition (which I do because I play full screen anyhow), I rarely dip below 30 FPS. I'm usually just over 40. That's on fleet, and on Ilum.

No OC (don't get me started on why OC is bad in most - not all, but most - cases), all stock, home brewed, nothing fancy except my UV reactive case and UV lights.

Maybe 30fps isn't a beast, but so what? The game is pretty as it can be (granted, not as pretty as the failure that is FF14), and it runs smooth enough that I don't suffer worse in the game play department.

Rig cost me just over 1k after I bought a super nice monitor and second keyboard/mouse.
You are right, 30 fps is perfectly fine for any game. Those who are concerned about thier fps when they dip below 60 fps are too FPS focused. And it seems to be something some like to brag about..." Hey man!, I get 110 fps on my beast!". OC is not good for any system when you want that system to last a long time. Generates a lot more heat and heat will decrease the life of any electronic component.
Trust is something which is earned.

Gohlar's Avatar


Gohlar
03.02.2012 , 08:16 AM | #83
Quote: Originally Posted by Inarai View Post
Most people won't notice until the frame-rate drops under 30. The "under 60 is terrible" folks fall into one of two categories:

- Experienceing a placebo effect from knowing the frame-rate, likely due to a conversation with someone from the second group.
- A certain small portion of the population is actually able to notice frame-to-frame lag before 60 frames. After that, it's pretty much impossible.
I can tell you the frame rate up to the mid 50s. The difference between 30 and 60 is clear as day for me.

I have a hard time believing others can't tell the difference at all...

Quote: Originally Posted by Valkirus View Post
You are right, 30 fps is perfectly fine for any game. Those who are concerned about thier fps when they dip below 60 fps are too FPS focused. And it seems to be something some like to brag about..." Hey man!, I get 110 fps on my beast!". OC is not good for any system when you want that system to last a long time. Generates a lot more heat and heat will decrease the life of any electronic component.
30 FPS isn't very smooth. I guess people with weak eyes like to make excuses?

Crazy....

Vulgarr's Avatar


Vulgarr
03.02.2012 , 08:18 AM | #84
Quote: Originally Posted by origamikitsune View Post
Go with the first one. Normally I would avoid that brand of video card because of personal preference, however, it has two things going for it.

1.) Lots of RAM. RAM is probably the easiest / cheapest way to upgrade computers.

2.) It doesn't have two video cards. While SLI and Crossfire are nice, if you are looking at a long-term purchase, you want to stay away from specialized technologies that may be significantly deprecated down the line. Games that are not optimized for SLI will definitely see improvement, however, fit they are, they will see even more.

nVidia is constantly putting out driver updates that include specific updates for SLI; in two years if they are using SLI2, or some other new/better technology you are loosing out on what you spent.

There is one thing you need to know though!

SSD's are not good for heavy use. When you get the new rig, make sure that the operating system is installed on the non SSD hard drive. If you don't, you run the risk of burning the drive out all together. SSD's are getting better, but they are still relatively new.

If the operating system comes pre-installed on the SSD, I strongly, strongly, reccomend wiping your hard drives and re-installing on the normal HD.

Go ahead and put your game installs on the SSD, and if you need more performance tweaks, ask in here about moving your App Data to the SSD, or moving your virtual memory to your SSD. BUt make sure you reasearch the brand/model of your SSD to see how it holds up over time, and make sure you understand the risks.

EDIT: If it were -my- computer, I would go with the last one you listed, with the ASUS mother board and nVidia video card. As a personal preference, those are two brands I trust (especially ASUS) in general. But it is also a computer I would expect to upgrade later - especially in the RAM department.
i think you mean make sure your operating system is on the SSD.

because thats what we all do with SSDs. use it as a boot drive and only install aps that we use alot or have long load times on a regular HDD.

Vulgarr's Avatar


Vulgarr
03.02.2012 , 08:19 AM | #85
Quote: Originally Posted by Valkirus View Post
I am not sure the one in game is accurate. I have Vsnyc on and refresh rate set on my monitor to 60 hz...so it should'nt exceed 60 fps. Which is what it shows consistently in WoW. Never exceeds 60. In TOR however...it runs between 72 - 78 FPS.
the one on the LEFT is current FPS, the one on the right is the average FPS.

the only one you need to worry about is the one on the right.

Gohlar's Avatar


Gohlar
03.02.2012 , 08:19 AM | #86
Quote: Originally Posted by Vulgarr View Post
i think you mean make sure your operating system is on the SSD.

because thats what we all do with SSDs. use it as a boot drive and only install aps that we use alot or have long load times on a regular HDD.
QFT

Why in the world would you put your OS on the data drive?

lol

Sheff's Avatar


Sheff
03.02.2012 , 08:19 AM | #87
If you have a monitor that runs at 60hz then your FPS will NOT exceed 60fps. Simply because your monitor cannot draw the frames any faster.
When it tries to you get screen tearing. So the frames you think you are getting are being lost. it's simply that the primary buffer in your GPU is trying to push more frames on screen per second than your monitor can handle.

So all these people saying they get 60+ fps are lying. It may still show in a fps counter that you are getting more because that is possibly what your rig is capable of.
But you are not getting those frames, they are lost as your monitor cannot draw them quickly enough.
So unless you have a monitor that supports above that refresh rate you will not get those frame rates.
If you don't believe me I can link an article about it.
Just a heads up for people.
Intel Core i7-3770K 3.50GHz (Ivybridge) | 16GB Team Xtreem LV DDR3 2600 Quad-Channel CL10 | Gigabyte Z77-G1-Sniper 3 Intel Z77 | 2 x Gigabyte GTX 680's SOC SLI | Z906 Logitech Optical Speakers 5.1 | Benq 120mhz Monitor 1920x1080 | Recon 3D Fatality Series Sound Card (4 cores) | Corsair 1200W PSU | 512GB Crucial SSD | 2TB Seagate SATA 3 HDD |

Valkirus's Avatar


Valkirus
03.02.2012 , 08:21 AM | #88
Quote: Originally Posted by Gohlar View Post
I can tell you the frame rate up to the mid 50s. The difference between 30 and 60 is clear as day for me.

I have a hard time believing others can't tell the difference at all...



30 FPS isn't very smooth. I guess people with weak eyes like to make excuses?

Crazy....
And some let thier imaginations exceed reality. The turth is, most cannot tell any difference between 30 and 60 fps when conducted in a non bias condition. Not saying this applies to all, but to most it does.
Trust is something which is earned.

Vulgarr's Avatar


Vulgarr
03.02.2012 , 08:23 AM | #89
Quote: Originally Posted by Valkirus View Post
You are right, 30 fps is perfectly fine for any game. Those who are concerned about thier fps when they dip below 60 fps are too FPS focused. And it seems to be something some like to brag about..." Hey man!, I get 110 fps on my beast!". OC is not good for any system when you want that system to last a long time. Generates a lot more heat and heat will decrease the life of any electronic component.
this is not true. it is subjective to taste.

i know people that cant play games that dip below 30 fps because it makes the physically ill with motion sickness. they cant play consoles because of this.

no one that plays games on pc settles for less than 60fps. especially in pvp or first person shooters.

Mephistofilus's Avatar


Mephistofilus
03.02.2012 , 08:23 AM | #90
Quote: Originally Posted by origamikitsune View Post
Go with the first one. Normally I would avoid that brand of video card because of personal preference, however, it has two things going for it.

1.) Lots of RAM. RAM is probably the easiest / cheapest way to upgrade computers.

2.) It doesn't have two video cards. While SLI and Crossfire are nice, if you are looking at a long-term purchase, you want to stay away from specialized technologies that may be significantly deprecated down the line. Games that are not optimized for SLI will definitely see improvement, however, fit they are, they will see even more.

nVidia is constantly putting out driver updates that include specific updates for SLI; in two years if they are using SLI2, or some other new/better technology you are loosing out on what you spent.

There is one thing you need to know though!

SSD's are not good for heavy use. When you get the new rig, make sure that the operating system is installed on the non SSD hard drive. If you don't, you run the risk of burning the drive out all together. SSD's are getting better, but they are still relatively new.

If the operating system comes pre-installed on the SSD, I strongly, strongly, reccomend wiping your hard drives and re-installing on the normal HD.

Go ahead and put your game installs on the SSD, and if you need more performance tweaks, ask in here about moving your App Data to the SSD, or moving your virtual memory to your SSD. BUt make sure you reasearch the brand/model of your SSD to see how it holds up over time, and make sure you understand the risks.

EDIT: If it were -my- computer, I would go with the last one you listed, with the ASUS mother board and nVidia video card. As a personal preference, those are two brands I trust (especially ASUS) in general. But it is also a computer I would expect to upgrade later - especially in the RAM department.
Question... what if i went with the last one like you said...
• Intel® Core™ i7-2600K Processor
• 8GB PC1600 Corsair Vengeance
• 2 x NVIDIA GTX580 1.5GB Video
• Asus Z68 USB3 & SATA3 MB
• OCZ 120GB SATA3 SSD
• 2TB SATA3 7200 RPM HD
• LG 12X Blu-Ray Rewriter

Then changed the processor to the i7-3930K when I was customizing it.
Would there be any other changes I would need to make because of upgrading the processor? Then in the future I could upgrade the ram.
Also.. how does that GTX 580 compare to the video cards in the other PC's i listed?