'If' the game goes F2P, What happens?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic
'If' the game goes F2P, What happens?

Page 9 of 14 « First < 7 8 9 10 11 > Last »

Akirator

02.22.2012 , 12:12 AM \| #81	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Volksworgen Bioware should have never picked on this MMO because I am pretty sure it's going to fail HARD once GW2, D3 and MoP comes out. GW2 alone delivers more than this game can ever dream of delivering. Bioware's name will turn into **** because of this game's failure. They should have stayed with SP games. Riiight, cuz all those people I saw ranting about kung-fu pandas, extreme focus on PVP and a no auto attack class in an auto attack game were just my imagination. And thats just MoP In D3 we have almost all incentive to actually play with other people removed and even if you want to, you can only have FOUR people in one game. GW2 once again has a massive focus on PvP, or is this the game that calls it RvR? Regardless it's an almost completely different fanbase than the traditional MMO has, and like TOR its been hyped to hell and back and i guarantee will disappoint ALOT of people.

Volksworgen

02.22.2012 , 12:14 AM \| #82	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Akirator Riiight, cuz all those people I saw ranting about kung-fu pandas, extreme focus on PVP and a no auto attack class in an auto attack game were just my imagination. And thats just MoP In D3 we have almost all incentive to actually play with other people removed and even if you want to, you can only have FOUR people in one game. GW2 once again has a massive focus on PvP, or is this the game that calls it RvR? Regardless it's an almost completely different fanbase than the traditional MMO has, and like TOR its been hyped to hell and back and i guarantee will disappoint ALOT of people. I am no way defending GW2, but that game really stands out or at least to me. The first one was heavily focused on PVP but the 2nd one is not just PVP. It's more than PVP if you watch the videos at guildwars2guru website

Kaskava

02.22.2012 , 12:15 AM \| #83	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Akirator Riiight, cuz all those people I saw ranting about kung-fu pandas, extreme focus on PVP and a no auto attack class in an auto attack game were just my imagination. And thats just MoP In D3 we have almost all incentive to actually play with other people removed and even if you want to, you can only have FOUR people in one game. GW2 once again has a massive focus on PvP, or is this the game that calls it RvR? Regardless it's an almost completely different fanbase than the traditional MMO has, and like TOR its been hyped to hell and back and i guarantee will disappoint ALOT of people. I actually haven't heard much about GW2, not that I've paid attention. That said, I doubt this game will fail anytime soon.
This just in: Expanding on an ending no one likes is not improving said ending. A polished turd is still a turd.

Degarmo

02.22.2012 , 12:15 AM \| #84	Quote
Never understood some folks' inability to play more than one game. How about playing SWTOR AND Diablo III? Why all the need to be in just one game? I guess if you feel you have to be playing the same thing all the time to stay "competitive" or some other such stuff, then I get it. But I don't get it
The Last - A gaming guild of old codgers. www.thelastguild.com . RIP

Kaskava

02.22.2012 , 12:17 AM \| #85	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Volksworgen I am no way defending GW2, but that game really stands out or at least to me. The first one was heavily focused on PVP but the 2nd one is not just PVP. It's more than PVP if you watch the videos at guildwars2guru website I don't see Diablo really drawing people away, unless there's a major element that needs a sub. Nor do I think GW2 will. It'll draw some, sure, but that's to be expected. I think the fact that you pay for the client, then MTs at your disposal is going to provide people a lot of incentive to not drop their sub. As for MoP, well, read my sig.
This just in: Expanding on an ending no one likes is not improving said ending. A polished turd is still a turd.

Kaskava

02.22.2012 , 12:19 AM \| #86	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Degarmo Never understood some folks' inability to play more than one game. How about playing SWTOR AND Diablo III? Why all the need to be in just one game? I guess if you feel you have to be playing the same thing all the time to stay "competitive" or some other such stuff, then I get it. But I don't get it If you're more of a casual gamer, you might not have time to play both, so you might choose one over the other.
This just in: Expanding on an ending no one likes is not improving said ending. A polished turd is still a turd.

Lord_Scythe

02.22.2012 , 12:20 AM \| #87	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Volksworgen I am no way defending GW2, but that game really stands out or at least to me. The first one was heavily focused on PVP but the 2nd one is not just PVP. It's more than PVP if you watch the videos at guildwars2guru website Too much hype on any game will make it a disappointment. No MMO is perfect at launch and most don't get good until the 1 year mark. People quit and when stuff gets fixed they end up coming back. Nature of the MMO market.
To quote well me "Go be stupid on your own time!"

Dayfax

02.22.2012 , 12:23 AM \| #88	Quote
What amazes me is that every new MMO release is hailed as if it's the Second Coming of Lord British, but almost every single one of these games end up to be disappoints. Some on a more massive scale than others. Gamers never seem to learn.
"Sounds like you could use a soldier."

Kaskava

02.22.2012 , 12:24 AM \| #89	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Dayfax What amazes me is that every new MMO release is hailed as if it's the Second Coming of Lord British, but almost every single one of these games end up to be disappoints. Some on a more massive scale than others. Gamers never seem to learn. Who's Lord British? Is he one of the OD's? (Original Darths)
This just in: Expanding on an ending no one likes is not improving said ending. A polished turd is still a turd.

Akirator

02.22.2012 , 12:26 AM \| #90	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Kaskava Who's Lord British? Is he one of the OD's? (Original Darths) If you're serious...../facepalm Wow, now I feel old.

Page 9 of 14 « First < 7 8 9 10 11 > Last »

STAR WARS: The Old Republic

LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

You are about to leave this website...

This page is not meant to keep you from following the link you've clicked on. It is just a warning that you are about to leave this website. To go to this page, click the link below.

If you do not wish to follow this link, simply
close this message.

The statements and opinions expressed on these websites are solely those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, nor are they endorsed by Bioware, LucasArts, and its licensors do not guarantee the accuracy of, and are in no way responsible for any content on these websites.

Close Continue