Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

NA Server Status 9:48 EST: Population Thriving!

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
NA Server Status 9:48 EST: Population Thriving!

CeruleanNite's Avatar


CeruleanNite
02.18.2012 , 10:22 PM | #31
Quote: Originally Posted by Enkenon View Post
Open world PvP does suck.(worst PvP I've ever seen)
There are Fps issues especially for a DX9 based MMO with PS3 textures and shadows.
Trolls do damage but fanboys also do damage.
The whole SWTOR universe is not your healthy polulated server if you are on one.
There are also really lightly populated servers.
And players might also leave the game because of that.
So mentioning the problem is not trolling

Mentioning problems in the correct forum is not trolling.
Mentioning problems in the correct thread is not trolling.

Your 0 for 2 at this point.

I agree that their are people with the issues you mentioned above. I must not be a fanbois cause I admit there is problems, but pointing those problems out in the correct forum is one thing, doing so in the incorrect forum in a thread that is not about them is now what is considered trolling, and that is what you did.

Enkenon's Avatar


Enkenon
02.18.2012 , 10:23 PM | #32
Quote: Originally Posted by CeruleanNite View Post
On the server I am playing on it is marked as High.

On the fleet I have noticed upwards of 100 people. On DK around 120 and on Blamora around 80.

These numbers has higher then what I recall them being last week.

Now if Bioware is making the servers look high then they must also be adding people to zones to make it appear as there is more.

So if you believe this conspiracy theory then please dont forget to put on your foil hat and make sure all of your window blinds are closed.
And my server is light populated.
Where does that get us?
You win?
There are some light populated servers that need to be boosted either by merging or by
server transferring cause it is really a shame to play SWTOR on a server that looks empty.
(ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZB]]]]][[[[[BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ)

Tyranox's Avatar


Tyranox
02.18.2012 , 10:24 PM | #33
That population thing is full of crap.

Enkenon's Avatar


Enkenon
02.18.2012 , 10:25 PM | #34
Quote: Originally Posted by CeruleanNite View Post
Mentioning problems in the correct forum is not trolling.
Mentioning problems in the correct thread is not trolling.

Your 0 for 2 at this point.

I agree that their are people with the issues you mentioned above. I must not be a fanbois cause I admit there is problems, but pointing those problems out in the correct forum is one thing, doing so in the incorrect forum in a thread that is not about them is now what is considered trolling, and that is what you did.


lol.I quoted a previous post when I wrote this.look at my original post plz.
and then look at the post I quoted.
(ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZB]]]]][[[[[BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ)

CeruleanNite's Avatar


CeruleanNite
02.18.2012 , 10:33 PM | #35
Quote: Originally Posted by Enkenon View Post
And my server is light populated.
Where does that get us?
You win?
There are some light populated servers that need to be boosted either by merging or by
server transferring cause it is really a shame to play SWTOR on a server that looks empty.
I was really posting a response to Lordskynite who has a theory that Bioware is only listing servers as high to make people believe they are high pop.

Anyway, I am not disputing that there arnt some low pop servers, I can see that there are. Bioware did state that mergers/transfer will be looked into, but I really dont see that happening anytime soon.

I have toons on 3 servers. One that is currently marked very high, one marked high and one marked low. There are times where I enjoy playing the toon on the low pop server more then the others as I dont have to fight over mobs, resources, places you have to click on, bosses, etc.

Anyway, if they would take those servers that are low pop and either merge them with another server or allow them to transfer then that would help.

Azzras's Avatar


Azzras
02.18.2012 , 10:35 PM | #36
Quote: Originally Posted by Enkenon View Post
And my server is light populated.
Where does that get us?
You win?
There are some light populated servers that need to be boosted either by merging or by
server transferring cause it is really a shame to play SWTOR on a server that looks empty.
Server xfers coming in the near future.
[ █ █ █ █ █] ( ) Ξ█████████████ The Shadowlands █████████████)

DarthSeidhr's Avatar


DarthSeidhr
02.18.2012 , 10:43 PM | #37
I want numbers. I don't care about the qualitative rankings. BioWare can change the definitions for the qualitative rankings any time they want. I'm not saying that they have manipulated rankings to make the game look more populated, it would just be very easy for them to do so.

Kanshan's Avatar


Kanshan
02.18.2012 , 10:44 PM | #38
Quote: Originally Posted by Tyranox View Post
That population thing is full of crap.
So much evidence supporting this it must be true.
Want to post feed back of why you're quitting? For the love of all that is good, post here http://www.swtor.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=349

Phaedrynn's Avatar


Phaedrynn
02.18.2012 , 10:46 PM | #39
Quick question...

Why do people use Fleet populations as an indicator of server population?

I ask because most of the people I know, in-game, avoid the fleet like the plague. I haven't been there since the mid 30s (48 now), and I can't remember that last time Ive seen anyone from my guild (of 24 active players) or on my friends list show up as being on the fleet.

Aquiraj's Avatar


Aquiraj
02.18.2012 , 10:48 PM | #40
Quote: Originally Posted by DarthSeidhr View Post
I want numbers. I don't care about the qualitative rankings. BioWare can change the definitions for the qualitative rankings any time they want. I'm not saying that they have manipulated rankings to make the game look more populated, it would just be very easy for them to do so.

This.
I would rather be hated for who I am...Than loved for who I'm not[