Give me a legitimate reason to NOT have a LFD tool.

STAR WARS: The Old Republic
Give me a legitimate reason to NOT have a LFD tool.

Page 109 of 110 « First < 9 59 99 107 108 109 110 >

samht

02.13.2012 , 08:33 PM \| #1081
Quote: Originally Posted by Raansu WoW's subscriptions were falling LONG before the LFD tool was implemented. Simply put, the game is getting old, people are getting bored and the expansions haven't been that great. This is normal for MMO's that have been online for as long as WoW has. It's called diminishing returns. To be fair, wow said there most successful feature ever was LFR the quarter b4 LFR wow lost 800k subs, after LFR they only lost 100k which was after their last content patch of an expack and a month after tor head start. The said it was there most competitive month since launch. So lfg and LFR good
What's up with the no LFG and LFR

ispanolfw

02.13.2012 , 08:34 PM \| #1082
Quote: Originally Posted by Heretiq Actually, it's the other way around. I won't be able to experience any group content at all due to my lowly populated server and my work schedule because you are forcing your way of grouping onto me. How thoughtful - sucks to be me I suppose eh. It didn't kill WoW (it's still going strong with 10 million paying and active subscriptions, being the single most revenue generating piece of entertainment in the history, afaik) and it's not going to kill SWTOR. Actually it's both. Putting it in will affect certain people. Not putting it in has already affected other people. The thing is, is it ok to just flip it like that? That's not for any of us to decide. BioWare would rather not do it, they've even stated as such.

Forsbacka

02.13.2012 , 08:36 PM \| #1083
Quote: Originally Posted by mothear Ah So:- 6m at end of classic 10m at end of TBC 12m after WotLK 10.2 currently When was LFD implemented again? Unless you are suggesting they wer above 12m at the start of WotLK, which they weren't. Also which part of 'I'm not suggesting that LFD was the sole reason' wasn't clear? Try again Or if the sub loss would have been even higher without LFG tool? Who knows.

mothear

02.13.2012 , 08:37 PM \| #1084
Quote: Originally Posted by Heretiq Actually, it's the other way around. I won't be able to experience any group content at all due to my lowly populated server and my work schedule because you are forcing your way of grouping onto me. How thoughtful - sucks to be me I suppose eh. It didn't kill WoW (it's still going strong with 10 million paying and active subscriptions, being the single most revenue generating piece of entertainment in the history, afaik) and it's not going to kill SWTOR. Well actually you would via cross server until 49. I suggest that it helped. I know why I left WoW and that was the vitriol in LFD on patch day 4.3 which was the final straw, something that LFD in my opinion was part of the cause

Forsbacka

02.13.2012 , 08:37 PM \| #1085
Quote: Originally Posted by ispanolfw Actually it's both. Putting it in will affect certain people. Not putting it in has already affected other people. The thing is, is it ok to just flip it like that? That's not for any of us to decide. BioWare would rather not do it, they've even stated as such. Its not theirs to choose, if it brings/keeps more subs, it will get added.

darkcerb

02.13.2012 , 08:37 PM \| #1086
Quote: Originally Posted by Optimism If LFD or LFR comes out in this game I for one will welcome it with open arms anyway. The typical least path of resistance and I get to act more of a douche. Why? Because I'll never see those people again. Then you're a hypocrite and the reason the system fails (for some, certainly not my exp of it) Grats, was that supposed to be for or against the tool?

Emeda

02.13.2012 , 08:38 PM \| #1087
Quote: Originally Posted by samht To be fair, wow said there most successful feature ever was LFR the quarter b4 LFR wow lost 800k subs, after LFR they only lost 100k which was after their last content patch of an expack and a month after tor head start. The said it was there most competitive month since launch. So lfg and LFR good LFG was introduced long before LFR. Also what you also dont include is was added along with the Dragonsoul tier. Not that that could of actually kept people from quitting (by having SOME CONTENT) Do you have a link to the article that they say LFR was thier most successful feature ever?
If this game is so great then why do so many people that love the game spend all their time in the forums?

Heretiq

02.13.2012 , 08:38 PM \| #1088
Quote: Originally Posted by ispanolfw Then let me ask, what if the real majority agreed it WAS a compromise they could live with? Not saying they would or that they are even the majority, what would you do? You said it's not an option, so would you keep playing, keep trying to change it, or would you perhaps stop playing? If the real majority agreed that it actually WAS a compromise they could live with (which won't happen - just my assumption) I will keep on playing but I will not play any group content at 50 at all - simply because my work schedule won't allow me to. I will definitely keep asking for a proper Cross-Server LFG-tool for level 50 Flashpoints though. I will level all of my 8 characters on my server (which are all level 20+) to 50 and then play some PvP I guess. We'll see.
English is not my first language.

Emeda

02.13.2012 , 08:40 PM \| #1089
Quote: Originally Posted by darkcerb Then you're a hypocrite and the reason the system fails (for some, certainly not my exp of it) Grats, was that supposed to be for or against the tool? Have a question for you. See sig.
If this game is so great then why do so many people that love the game spend all their time in the forums?

darkcerb

02.13.2012 , 08:41 PM \| #1090
Quote: Originally Posted by Emeda Have a question for you. See sig. Because I believe it could be far better, some reason you're here besides inflammatory posts and insults?

Page 109 of 110 « First < 9 59 99 107 108 109 110 >

Closed Thread

STAR WARS: The Old Republic

LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

You are about to leave this website...

This page is not meant to keep you from following the link you've clicked on. It is just a warning that you are about to leave this website. To go to this page, click the link below.

If you do not wish to follow this link, simply
close this message.

The statements and opinions expressed on these websites are solely those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, nor are they endorsed by Bioware, LucasArts, and its licensors do not guarantee the accuracy of, and are in no way responsible for any content on these websites.

Close Continue