Valor 70+ gear

People who kill trade all day should not be rewarded. Its called common sense.

Yes they should and they aint. QQ to BW. Say thanks to exploiters and kill traders.

Due to the fact that most recent patch 1.1.2, dealt with the HUGE problem that nely dinged people struggled competing with the highest teir of pvp gear on the warzones, do you really think this would be a wise idea?

Play less, reroll an alt, or go to another game imo...

if you beat a MMO (pvp part) 2months after release and expect more "content"(gear), MMO's probably arent the right for you.

Thats what rated warzones are for.

Not really. The gear advantage from Battlemaster isn't very significant over Champ. Not to mention diminishing returns at 500 expertise and most BMs are running around with plenty of PvE gear on.

Thats what cross server warzones are for. And adding more gear incentives would put MORE people into warzones. Currently there is no in-game incentive to queue up a warzone after your routine 3 daily wins if you're valor 60+.

New 50s can get geared in full cent/champ in a week. That is not a problem. And considering how easy it is to level a 50, your argument doesn't even belong in the thread.

Again, its called RATED WARZONES.

And fresh 50s with orange and lvl 40 greens should be getting demolished by someone that has spent hundreds of more hours PvPing.

And when you and all your PvP friends (and a large part of the PvP community) hit the new tier of gear within a short period of time and end up in the exact same position you are in now, will you complain you want valor 80+ gear?

Point is, the gear has to cap at some point, and if you are a true PvP player, gear is not the only reason you'd play PvP, Hint: It's called "FUN".

Then stop playing 12hours per day.. Im still not Rank 60 Not my fault you all rush the game and flame there is no content after 2month rofl

Not really. 60-70 is a much steeper climb than 20-60. If Bioware wanted to cap the pvp progression they should have made the max valor rank 65 or something, which they did not.

Gear shouldn't cap at an easily attainable rank like 60. And why should gear cap at 60 when the max valor rank is supposedly 100?

Warzones would be absolute ghost towns if PvP rewards did not exist. Your 'fun' argument is silly and also assumes the legit 70s aren't having 'fun'. Which again, doesn't make any sense considering they are PvPing more than most of their server with the only incentive of being 'fun'.

It's not their fault you keep rolling alts.

People that consistently win their warzones also rank up much faster than people that don't.

Correct, because pvp progression should be done through open world activities and a separate progression should be done through competitive instanced matches. warzones in their current state should be for fun (xp and credits are ok too to allow people to level through pvp) and not for pvp progression.

If they are not fun, they should be ghost towns, the fact they would be ghost towns if gear progression was not tied to them proves they are not fun.

CHAMP BAGS ARE THE SAME WAY BUT WORSE NOW!!


32 BAGS...NO TOKEN 1 for 1 exchange just 7 commedations.

1 Headpiece 67 tokens = 7 bags

1 weapon 123 tokens = 17 bags

THATS ONLY 2 PIECES OUT OF 11-12


THEY HAVE ACTUALLY STUNTED INCENTIVE TO REROLL TO REPUBLIC DUE TO THE GEAR HEADACHE.

MEANING.....IMP 3-4 TO 1 RATIO UNBALANCED POPULATION ALREADY GEARED WILL NEVER BALANCE OUT.


SO............AT LEAST YOU HAVE CHAMP GEAR !!!!!!!!!

i WILL BE VALOR 60 BEFORE I HAVE 1/2 MY GEAR WORST CASE, BEST CASE I WILL GET 2/3 WHEN IM A BATTLEMASTER.....GREAT FIX HUH??

I always thought people PvP-ed for the thrill, the competition and not for the gear.