Please, Don't Roll on Items for Another Class in Your Team

LOL, where did you come up with 300? more like 3000, this is the like the 4th or 5th thread about the subject.

and i still say loot hogs will be loot hogs..

When I 'need' it..

I'm still waiting for you to back up your 'willy-nilly' remark.

What you say does not make it fact.

It is selfish because you are imposing rules designed to increase the chance that you get the loot you want by attempting to deny others the right to roll as they wish. It might be a valid viewpoint (and it might not) but it still selfish. The unselfish thing to do is to let others roll how they like without complaining and acting like a martyr.

Another unselfish approach would be to not roll on things you need as an upgrade because someone else wants it for the looks.

You just did that for me, thank you.

Yeah, because trying to stack the deck in your favor is such a noble endeavor. If people weren't entitled to it, it wouldn't be available to them.

Get over yourself. You people are more selfish. If there was a rule being broken then maybe you would have a leg to stand on, but there isn't, and you don't.

LoL it's funny that you would even throw the "entitled" stone considering you're the one feeling "entitled" just because you can use it. Well guess what, needing credits is a legit need as well. Get over it and grow up.

The instant you bring in terms like "should", you're attempting a moralist argument that has no place in this particular discussion. Even if you allow for a moralist perspective, if you feel I should only roll Need if my PC will use it, and should only roll Greed if it's for a companion, if I feel differently, my perspective is as valid as yours, and yours doesn't obligate me to a course of action contrary to the one I've chosen. You'd need something more objective than that.

You're diluting the issue by using loaded terms and phrases like "justify" and "who they step on to get what they want". We're saying we aren't stepping on anyone; we're saying you should roll how you want, using whatever determining criteria is appropriate to meet your goals. You would attempt to restrict who can roll on something based on whether they meet your individual determination of "need".

I believe our system assumes the best of people: that they aren't out to intentionally screw someone else, that they believe people are free to roll how they like, and would never impose restrictions on how others can roll. I think that speaks more to "basic human decency" than a system which lets one person tell another "What I think determines need supersedes what you think determines need, so you should do it my way." That's what you're advocating.

No he didn't. What if he needs credits?

Please explain this nonsense? Or else you're just trolling as you are won't to do.

This is just pedantic.

My personal definitions of "need": Stat upgrade, appearance upgrade, companion upgrade for my primary companion, mods I can transfer to an item I'm wearing for the stat upgrade.

I don't roll need to sell something, and it's not "willy-nilly" rolling need on everything just because. You aren't even trying to debate a strawman any more, you're just flinging dirt at caricatures.