Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Please, Don't Roll on Items for Another Class in Your Team

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Please, Don't Roll on Items for Another Class in Your Team

Setanian's Avatar


Setanian
02.01.2012 , 04:49 PM | #881
Quote: Originally Posted by PoPPaDoM View Post
See this is where our missing it all...

I NEVER have to get a group, they line up for me! This is why you'r shouting for groups and I get tells as soon as a I log on
This is not all about you. I'm sure you'd like it to be, but hey, you're man that knows all about "I"..

I notice you didn't answer the question. Was it too difficult or by answering it would it lessen your claims?
What is that baseball bat in your signature? Oh! It's a lightsaber! How cute is that !

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
02.01.2012 , 04:50 PM | #882
Quote: Originally Posted by PoPPaDoM View Post
Said better than I could with out a considerable amount of effort... which neither of you are worth to be honest.
It's diversionary at best.

Edit: actually, I don't think it's even relevant to what he said... did he ever use the term "argument ad hominmen" ?

Quote:
I didn't continue because the last bit, obviously, wasn't pertinent.
No it's pertinent... that's what he's asking for; you still have yet to show how he misused the term..

Quote:
I don't need to explain his... the example I have given does it more than well enough.
The example does not show how he misused the term in any way.

PoPPaDoM's Avatar


PoPPaDoM
02.01.2012 , 04:51 PM | #883
Quote: Originally Posted by Eldren View Post
If you were attempting to prove that you weren't, in fact, using ad hominem attacks earlier, and that it was just sarcasm, I'd say you're falling a bit short of the goal.
I have proven it.. and of course "you" would say that. Nobody really likes to be wrong.

Oh and I am surprised that somebody so "experienced" could make such a schoolboy error.

Creed_Buhallin's Avatar


Creed_Buhallin
02.01.2012 , 04:51 PM | #884
Quote: Originally Posted by Grecanis View Post
I mean where do we draw the line? With out one, anyone at any time can find a justification to take that "greater chance"!
The horror of leaving it to people to make their own decisions!! Such chaos cannot be allowed to stand!

PoPPaDoM's Avatar


PoPPaDoM
02.01.2012 , 04:53 PM | #885
Quote: Originally Posted by ferroz View Post
It's diversionary at best.

No it's pertinent... that's what he's asking for; you still have yet to show how he misused the term..

The example does not show how he misused the term in any way.
Only in your mind... stop scrabbling it looks... unsightly.

PoPPaDoM's Avatar


PoPPaDoM
02.01.2012 , 04:54 PM | #886
Quote: Originally Posted by Setanian View Post
This is not all about you. I'm sure you'd like it to be, but hey, you're man that knows all about "I"..

I notice you didn't answer the question. Was it too difficult or by answering it would it lessen your claims?
I will, because when somebody says "no loot rules" they hear "I am a selfish git and will be rolling on everything".

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
02.01.2012 , 04:54 PM | #887
Quote: Originally Posted by PoPPaDoM View Post
Only in your mind... stop scrabbling it looks... unsightly.
So, I'm going to take this as an admission that you aren't capable of showing how he misused the term, and we should just accept the truth of his claim that you are wrong about him misusing the term.

Eldren's Avatar


Eldren
02.01.2012 , 04:54 PM | #888
Quote: Originally Posted by PoPPaDoM View Post
I have proven it.. and of course "you" would say that. Nobody really likes to be wrong.

Oh and I am surprised that somebody so "experienced" could make such a schoolboy error.
Copy/pasting a definition from a third party doesn't prove that someone else misused a term, or that you weren't in fact engaging in the very behavior you were accused of. It just defines a term, a definition that, while appreciated, wasn't needed, though you had no way of knowing that.

As for the error being "schoolboy", you've yet to actually prove an error was made in the first place. Meanwhile, you again duck and weave your way out of actually proving your point, retreating behind "I don't have to" and "I already did", when the fact that people continue questioning your assertion should provide ample evidence that you actually haven't.
<character name> of the <name> legacy, of <guild name>, a <type> guild on <server>
Referral link. Get a frack-ton of unlocks & help me out too! Click me for goodies.

Grecanis's Avatar


Grecanis
02.01.2012 , 04:55 PM | #889
Quote: Originally Posted by Creed_Buhallin View Post
The horror of leaving it to people to make their own decisions!! Such chaos cannot be allowed to stand!
Exactly


Remove the need button.
I plan on living forever ...so far so good!
Squadron 238

Irusan's Avatar


Irusan
02.01.2012 , 04:55 PM | #890
Quote: Originally Posted by Eldren View Post
Thanks for the lesson in terminology. It's stuff I learned when I started taking debate as a freshman in high school some 25 years ago. I learned it again when I joined the collegiate debate team 4 years later when I started my undergraduate studies. We'll ignore your editorializing about the quality of someone's mind and personality, since it seems rooted instead in your opposition to their perspective. I do have a question, however: what does it add to this particular discussion? If you were attempting to prove that you weren't, in fact, using ad hominem attacks earlier, and that it was just sarcasm, I'd say you're falling a bit short of the goal.
So, reading between the lines here, but you are just arguing for the sake of arguing? I bet you don't even really feel you are right about any of this, but are more here to see how many you can sway to your point of view just for the heck of it. Well played!