Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

6v8 why

KerryS's Avatar


KerryS
01.31.2012 , 12:30 PM | #1
why oh why do you insist on starting wz with unfair number. why why why? I'm confused, do you think its funny bioware cause i can assure you its not.

Foenixz's Avatar


Foenixz
01.31.2012 , 12:33 PM | #2
Quote: Originally Posted by KerryS View Post
why oh why do you insist on starting wz with unfair number. why why why? I'm confused, do you think its funny bioware cause i can assure you its not.
The WZ will end if both sides do not have the required number. There is a bug on the ops frames in WZs that will not show all participants take a moment and count the people inside.
Member Synergy Online Gaming

since 2002 and we are still going strong

Dee-Jay's Avatar


Dee-Jay
01.31.2012 , 12:33 PM | #3
Quote: Originally Posted by KerryS View Post
why oh why do you insist on starting wz with unfair number. why why why? I'm confused, do you think its funny bioware cause i can assure you its not.
I think this is just how the queue system works.

It will first make sure there are 8 people queuing on each side.

It will then invite everyone to join.

But sometimes people reject the invitation or forget about it and thus leaving one side outnumbered.

There's not really much you can do about it except.

1. Reduce the "join Warzone" period.

2. Remove the intros from WZs.

Tservo's Avatar


Tservo
01.31.2012 , 12:33 PM | #4
Quote: Originally Posted by Foenixz View Post
The WZ will end if both sides do not have the required number. There is a bug on the ops frames in WZs that will not show all participants take a moment and count the people inside.
No, it starts the WZ with 6 on your side. By the time a 7th and then an 8th member join, you pretty much have already lost the match.

Mertissielle's Avatar


Mertissielle
01.31.2012 , 12:35 PM | #5
Quote: Originally Posted by Tservo View Post
No, it starts the WZ with 6 on your side. By the time a 7th and then an 8th member join, you pretty much have already lost the match.
Is it definitely not two people who were offered a queue but declined/were AFK and not enough other people in queue to replace them? That's what I'd always assumed, but I could be wrong obviously.

"I'm a Marauder, I'm gonna make it, I will maraud, gonna keep on maraudin'"
- Desithy's Child

Eyevan's Avatar


Eyevan
01.31.2012 , 12:36 PM | #6
Apparently the way BW fixes faction imbalance is by rewarding and encouraging people to join the faction with the largest population.
Reply
STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > PvP
Terms Archive | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | FAQ | EUALA | Rules of Conduct | Online Safety | Contact Us
LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.