Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Will this setup run SWTOR on Ultra?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Will this setup run SWTOR on Ultra?

Kraith's Avatar


Kraith
01.30.2012 , 09:20 PM | #31
Quote: Originally Posted by eggs_to_see View Post
Partly right but you are misinformed on much of your opinion on this.

Firstly, the CPU in question is dramatically faster than anything AMD produces, in a game like this the phenom x6 would be no faster than a phenom x4 due to the poor thread optimisation in this game. Considering the S2011 cpu's are a good 20% faster than S1155 cpu's (think i5 2500k) you can expect anywhere from 40-60% better performance from the 3930k than a Phenom X6. That's not biased, or opinion that is fact, and I suggest you do further research on these cpu's.

Also, the 560ti is about 20% slower than a 580, again that can be the difference between making a game unplayable on max settings to making that same game run smooth as silk.

You certainly pay a price for the 580 though and if I was spending that sort of money and I needed a GPU right now I'd be looking at a 7970 from AMD.
when did I even compare the intel vs AMD cpus, i know the 3930 will destroy any of the phe II. It should because the phe II are a 2 year old Tech and the 3930 is Intels new baby.

I disagree on the 580..

the EVGA 560ti has what, 830ish+ core clock with around 1700 shader. The gig 580 sits with aroudn 795 core clock and 1590 shader clock (unless you get a OC/SC version). There is no way the 580 is 20% faster than the 560ti. I agree its better with 100+ more cores, but not 20% better.

eggs_to_see's Avatar


eggs_to_see
01.30.2012 , 09:33 PM | #32
Quote: Originally Posted by Racquerr View Post
Righ.............................................. .........t
I'm a big believer in supplying proof, so I'm happy to do so.

Here you go...

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/443?vs=203

Note* couldn't pick the 3930k, so had to go with it's big brother 3960k and I know thats faster, but it's the same architecture and performance isn't that much different.

Results really speak for themselves.

eggs_to_see's Avatar


eggs_to_see
01.30.2012 , 09:35 PM | #33
Quote: Originally Posted by Kraith View Post
when did I even compare the intel vs AMD cpus, i know the 3930 will destroy any of the phe II. It should because the phe II are a 2 year old Tech and the 3930 is Intels new baby.

I disagree on the 580..

the EVGA 560ti has what, 830ish+ core clock with around 1700 shader. The gig 580 sits with aroudn 795 core clock and 1590 shader clock (unless you get a OC/SC version). There is no way the 580 is 20% faster than the 560ti. I agree its better with 100+ more cores, but not 20% better.
Here ya go..

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/330?vs=305

Seriously it's over 20%... I was being quiet reserved in my estimations.

Nighenhale's Avatar


Nighenhale
01.30.2012 , 09:39 PM | #34
Quote: Originally Posted by Deshie View Post
When using the saying "unlucky bunch" is implying people who have fps issues are in the minority. Take your own advice. I can tell you the game is badly coded you cannot prove me wrong. Which is most likely true a) that game runs superb for everyone or b) the game is coded badly that most people get bad fps and that most people dont check fps because they are casuals? Have you noticed most of the people whom are complaining about fps issues have top rigs and understand fps unlike most casuals. Please I like to see your "counter argument".
"bunch" is just another word for "group", I think you are mistaking it with "unlucky few" which I did not write because the group seems too big to call it a "few". Is the engine badly coded? I do believe it is, I believe it still needs a whole lot of work to make it run perfectly for almost everyone that has a system above the requirements. I have no framerate problems, but with AA enabled my GPU gets much hotter than it should and I encountered some other graphical issues. Just my fps is not a problem.

Now for your a vs b argument: No game runs superb for everyone, that is impossible so option a will never happen. With option b you claim that everyone that claims they have the game running smoothly are casuals that have never used the ctrl+shift+f combo to check how their framerate is. A rather silly remark to be honest. Just because a bunch of people (again I am not saying how big or small that group is) are having low framerates does not mean everyone has those problems. And then your last remark again claiming that only the uninformed are not having problems because they have no idea what framerates are.

Please just stop trolling. The framerate issues are real and they need to be fixed, but the way you are talking about it is just complete and total nonsense.

*sighs*

Ah heck, I've gotten myself lured into the troll trap. You won simply because you got me to react.

*Breaks open the trap and walks away.*

Jazhara's Avatar


Jazhara
01.30.2012 , 09:42 PM | #35
You can probably save yourself about $1000 on that system and still run SWTOR on max by going for i5 2500K with a GTX560. You'd also be able to run BF3 with that on ultra @ 40FPS minimal.

That $1000 saved you can stick into another up-to-date system 2-3 years down the road.

I don't understand why you would go for the most expensive, newest stuff that will set you back twice as much. Then again - if I would have the money to burn, I'd probably do the same.
"It is only through interaction, through decision and choice, through confrontation, physical or mental, that the Force can grow within you." (*Kreia)
WARCHILD LEGACY - VROOK LAMAR

Denskoo's Avatar


Denskoo
01.30.2012 , 09:56 PM | #36
Personally I'd save myself $700+ or so by going with a GTX 560ti and waiting for the cheaper socket 2011 i7 coming out in February. It's basically a 4 core instead of the 6 core versions out now, but still would allow use of the very nice looking 2011 socket based motherboards.

Then I'd dump a bit of the saved cash on a decent 256GB SSD

Deshie's Avatar


Deshie
01.30.2012 , 11:21 PM | #37
I would advise everyone to read this link. It's by the BioWare team

http://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?t=252808

It basically says nothing is their problem the game is perfect and working as intended. Your $2,000 pc is problem.

Lol can Bioware become even more of a joke.
Rahul - Assassin - Kai Khan

bliapis's Avatar


bliapis
01.30.2012 , 11:22 PM | #38
you will be running most of the game at high fps but without antialiasing.
i5 2500k OC @ 4Ghz | Thermaltek Hyper TX3 air cooler | 8gb Corsair Vengeance | Asus GTX580 CU | Asus Maximus IV GenZ/Gen3 | Thermatek 750W PSU -==- Server: Fredon Nad (EU)// Characters: [B]Vanguard L50: Clipjunkie// [B]Sentinel L50: Seithan// Juggernaur L50: Shaithis // Sorcerer L42: Rasthavas

DJayB's Avatar


DJayB
01.30.2012 , 11:33 PM | #39
Quote: Originally Posted by Milkmilk View Post
Howdy guys, will be running this setup in a couple of days, just wondering if it will be capable of running this game on Ultra settings?

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3, Intel X79 Chipset, 4x DDR3, SATA3, PCI-E 3.0, 7.1 Dolby Audio, USB3, GB LAN

CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K (3.20Ghz / 12MB / LGA2011 / Six Core)

Memory: G.Skill 16GB (4x4GB) DDR3 Kit, PC-12800 (1600Mhz), RipjawsZ, Quad Channel Kit

Video: Gigabyte Geforce GTX580 (795Mhz), 1536MB GDDR5 (4008Mhz), PCI-E 2.0, 2x Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI

Thanks for taking your time to respond, appreciate it!
I have the same video card and installed this today to drop the temp cause i run dual monitors and it was getting to hot playing this game

I have the i7 990x and that is running great with 12GB of ram, on intel's extreme board and have all of the setting on "ultra" and play the game fine with no problems, never drop fps to where it flickers or anything, I am sure you will be fine

dosyr's Avatar


dosyr
01.30.2012 , 11:34 PM | #40
Quote: Originally Posted by Jazhara View Post
You can probably save yourself about $1000 on that system and still run SWTOR on max by going for i5 2500K with a GTX560.
it's true, i do =D i5 second gen, 3.2


Quote: Originally Posted by Denskoo View Post
Personally I'd save myself $700+ or so by going with a GTX 560ti
560ti actually has higher clock speeds that that other graphics card....http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...125&CatId=3669

that's what i use, during pvp on max setting my fps is 60+