Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Will this setup run SWTOR on Ultra?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Will this setup run SWTOR on Ultra?

Nighenhale's Avatar


Nighenhale
01.30.2012 , 08:53 PM | #21
Quote: Originally Posted by Deshie View Post
Implying you speak for everyone else? 99% people dont even check their fps so they probably just play without realising how bad this game is coded.
Reading comprehension is a good thing to improve. I don't use the word "everyone" or made up percentages, you do. Many are having framerate problems, many are not. Which group is biggest is something neither of us are able to find out.

Deshie's Avatar


Deshie
01.30.2012 , 09:01 PM | #22
Quote: Originally Posted by Nighenhale View Post
Reading comprehension is a good thing to improve. I don't use the word "everyone" or made up percentages, you do. Many are having framerate problems, many are not. Which group is biggest is something neither of us are able to find out.
When using the saying "unlucky bunch" is implying people who have fps issues are in the minority. Take your own advice. I can tell you the game is badly coded you cannot prove me wrong. Which is most likely true a) that game runs superb for everyone or b) the game is coded badly that most people get bad fps and that most people dont check fps because they are casuals? Have you noticed most of the people whom are complaining about fps issues have top rigs and understand fps unlike most casuals. Please I like to see your "counter argument".
Rahul - Assassin - Kai Khan

ThomastheHut's Avatar


ThomastheHut
01.30.2012 , 09:01 PM | #23
Quote: Originally Posted by Umbrex View Post
OP is one of two things

1) Ridiculously wealthy, and doesn't work very hard for money.
2) Pretending to be buying a ridic nice computer for internet points. (System spec looks like something someone would put together newegg as a dream computer)

I pose a third option:
OP is trolling, knowing full-well the graphics conundrum and uses hyperbole to make the subtle point.

Love surfing new-egg for dream parts though
My kingdom for a de-railed fighter ship!
Core gamers cannot be counted on to support good games, but casual gamers can be counted on to support almost anything, so long as it piques their interest. ~Jim Sterling-The Escapist

Kraith's Avatar


Kraith
01.30.2012 , 09:02 PM | #24
Quote: Originally Posted by Nighenhale View Post
Reading comprehension is a good thing to improve. I don't use the word "everyone" or made up percentages, you do. Many are having framerate problems, many are not. Which group is biggest is something neither of us are able to find out.
I have a question, what is considered to be "frame rate issues"? Is anything around 20 an issue? Is anything around 30 an issue? I sit at around 30-38fps in WZ and 60-69 on planets while 20-25 on fleet. Even at 20-25 while on fleet I do not think I have issues and do not see a issue with it.

So I guess I am with you in the fact I do not have any FPS issues. But I guess if I was a 15 yo child who is use to having mommy pop her milk glands in my mouth when I am hungry then anything under 40 would be an issue....

ItchyThePenguin's Avatar


ItchyThePenguin
01.30.2012 , 09:02 PM | #25
Hehe. Methinks you just wanted to show off your amazing specs!

Nah, just kidding. But seriously, though, I'm super jealous! Happy gaming!
Jedi Guardian -- Miscreant (65)
Formerly of Mind Trick and Corellian Run -- Now of The Shadowlands

eggs_to_see's Avatar


eggs_to_see
01.30.2012 , 09:06 PM | #26
Quote: Originally Posted by Kraith View Post
MOBO: That is a nice MOBO with 4 PCI(16) slots, supports both SLI/Crossfirex, but is a standard size (make sure your case is not set for micro boards only) = 269

CPU: Strong and fast with good core speeds. The 6x core is a great CPU (at least the AMD Phe II are) = $599

RAM: Gskill is a good brand but 16gigs is high and overkill. = $89

GPU: the GTX 580 is a crazy GPU and is a waste of money. It performs only a fraction better than the GTX 560ti and is twice as much. = $509

so far you have spent $1466 and you havent even stated what type of case, cooling system, fan support and software you will have.

I do not know if you are upgrading an existing Rig or building/having one built from scratch. But you can add $199 for Win 7 prem 64 bit version or $99 for Win 7 prem OEM version.

Your tower with that MOBO, CPU and GPU will need to have atleast a 750 (80+) PSU and will need to support a standard board format. The case will need to offer a good air flow because from what I have read about the Gig 580, it gets how and MOBO temps will skyrocket if you do not support it with atleast 2 120mm fans around teh GPU area.

Honestly, if your desire is to play this game with no issues on both max in game settings as well as card control settings, then you are spending way to much. When it is all said and done, you will have spend close to $2k on a system that will be outdated in a year. The new NVIDIA GPUs will be out in a few months and the INTEL chip, well, its great but its $$$$ and is only a bit better than a AMD hex corer version.


either way, good luck!
Partly right but you are misinformed on much of your opinion on this.

Firstly, the CPU in question is dramatically faster than anything AMD produces, in a game like this the phenom x6 would be no faster than a phenom x4 due to the poor thread optimisation in this game. Considering the S2011 cpu's are a good 20% faster than S1155 cpu's (think i5 2500k) you can expect anywhere from 40-60% better performance from the 3930k than a Phenom X6. That's not biased, or opinion that is fact, and I suggest you do further research on these cpu's.

Also, the 560ti is about 20% slower than a 580, again that can be the difference between making a game unplayable on max settings to making that same game run smooth as silk.

You certainly pay a price for the 580 though and if I was spending that sort of money and I needed a GPU right now I'd be looking at a 7970 from AMD.

AKfourtyseven's Avatar


AKfourtyseven
01.30.2012 , 09:06 PM | #27
Quote: Originally Posted by Deshie View Post
No. Nothing can run Swtor on so called "Ultra" there is only 2 settings which are Low or High. High textures look worse than n64 games.
Hyperbole ftw...

I know the game doesnt look like Skyrim, but people talking about N64 graphics need to load up nvidia inspector and tweak some settings.

Damn

Kraith's Avatar


Kraith
01.30.2012 , 09:08 PM | #28
Quote: Originally Posted by Deshie View Post
When using the saying "unlucky bunch" is implying people who have fps issues are in the minority. Take your own advice. I can tell you the game is badly coded you cannot prove me wrong. Which is most likely true a) that game runs superb for everyone or b) the game is coded badly that most people get bad fps and that most people dont check fps because they are casuals? Have you noticed most of the people whom are complaining about fps issues have top rigs and understand fps unlike most casuals. Please I like to see your "counter argument".
most people I have read complaining about FPS issues are using their 2008 Laptops with 2 gb or ram on a win 7 64bit OS. Honestly, I can only think of a few "FPS issue" post that would list their specs and when they did, wow, yeah not top of the line. Now, I know when I use my sony vios laptop with its Intel 2.10 ghz dual core, 3 gb or ram, and on-board intel HD GPU, the game looks and plays like crap and even on the lowest settings, i get around 12fps. But that in no way is a top of the line rig like my desk top is...

so, yeah, I need to see more specs to believe great rigs are having issues.

KamikazeBrAh's Avatar


KamikazeBrAh
01.30.2012 , 09:08 PM | #29
Why do people ask such stupid questions?

Like you didn't know that rig could run this game on the highest settings, only an idiot wouldn't know a rig like that couldn't run this game on the highest settings. But then again you might just be one because you bought 16gb's of RAM, which is completely useless and overboard, so actually I take my statement back, you might be a retard, probably are.
SO LONESTAR, NOW YOU SEE THAT EVIL WILL ALWAYS TRIUMPH, BECAUSE GOOD IS DUMB.

Racquerr's Avatar


Racquerr
01.30.2012 , 09:17 PM | #30
Quote: Originally Posted by eggs_to_see View Post
Firstly, the CPU in question is dramatically faster than anything AMD produces, in a game like this the phenom x6 would be no faster than a phenom x4 due to the poor thread optimisation in this game. Considering the S2011 cpu's are a good 20% faster than S1155 cpu's (think i5 2500k) you can expect anywhere from 40-60% better performance from the 3930k than a Phenom X6. That's not biased, or opinion that is fact, and I suggest you do further research on these cpu's.

You certainly pay a price for the 580 though and if I was spending that sort of money and I needed a GPU right now I'd be looking at a 7970 from AMD.
Righ.............................................. .........t