Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

No, You May Not Roll on Items for Another Class and Strip Out the Mods

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
No, You May Not Roll on Items for Another Class and Strip Out the Mods

DrunkenGundark's Avatar


DrunkenGundark
01.27.2012 , 03:13 PM | #1101
Quote: Originally Posted by Eldren View Post
This isn't about the "common good", which isn't even defined in this (or any other) game. If the "common good" is about putting the group's needs above the individual's, then no one gets anything because everyone's passing so someone else can have it. Then to distribute anything, you require an impartial system, unaffectable by anyone involved, to determine disbursement.

Oh wait, we have that already!

Yes, a fanatical adherence in this particular argument to "You can't tell me what to do" is quite germane, as it's the fundamental underpinning of the argument from those who say "You should not do as you like if it keeps me from getting what I want."

At least those who say "Roll for everything" are willing to let whoever wins the roll have what they won. They aren't attempting to restrict others' freedoms.

The key word is "attempting", as no one here can actually restrict the freedom of another player to roll as they personally desire when loot pops up.
And that's why I think it's so hard for people to agree on just how this sort of thing can be handled. I can very much see a "common good" when it comes to handling loot distribution. If a member of a party gets an upgrade to his equipment, that benefits me in the short term (for the remaining duration of the flashpoint or operation) it benefits him in the short term, it benefits the rest of the party in the short term. It benefits all of us in the long term if any of us ever run with that player again, and even if we don't, at the very least, we have one player out there who has better equipment than he had when he started. This is a good thing. I consider that a common good even if that's not something that can be strictly defined.

So yes, I prioritize that over someone who is willing to let anyone roll for anything as their whim suits them and where we may end up with instances of people walking away with equipment that does not benefit them stats-wise/power-wise but that they took only for looks purposes.

Usefulness takes precedence over vanity. Maybe that's a value you'd prefer I not be espousing because you don't like the idea that I'm putting my priorities in your face, but so be it. The system, as is, lends itself to this kind of abuse. And until people start being a bit more responsible with their use of the "Need" button, you're not going to convince me that there shouldn't be some more control hard-coded into the looting system, or at the very least, a more stringent community-based policy put in force on what's acceptable and what's not.

ispanolfw's Avatar


ispanolfw
01.27.2012 , 03:13 PM | #1102
Quote: Originally Posted by Loendar View Post
While she is allowed to approach the game as a purely aesthetic approach - when she is grouping she is part of a team that is trying to succeed at the task at hand.

Loot in an MMO, at the core, is meant to increase your character stats/skills to make them able to take on bigger and better things. Can it be pretty too? Sure.

I do not group with the concept that I will be facilitating someone to play Barbie Dress-up to the detriment of everyone else in the group.

I would suggest that the broker would be a better avenue for your wife's playstyle than grouping.
Then present it at the beginning so they can leave if they disagree. It's rather simple, you may not agree with it, but don't be silent then boot them, badmouth them, whatever because they did what they felt was right for them, and nothing was said prior so they could drop and let you find someone else.

Galbatorrix's Avatar


Galbatorrix
01.27.2012 , 03:14 PM | #1103
Quote: Originally Posted by Calsetes View Post
I'm a Sentinel who wears smuggler gear. The difference? I found it myself, bought it myself, made it myself, or checked with the group to see if I could need it before hitting need. Me obtaining all my gear has not pissed off a single person so far, because I took the time to make sure everyone's kosher with me nabbing it.

I have no idea how people take the risk of pissing off people by doing whatever they want.
I solute you sir. You play the game the right way.

Zhothon's Avatar


Zhothon
01.27.2012 , 03:14 PM | #1104
Quote: Originally Posted by Maccaroth View Post
Take into consideration that anyone from any realm can post in these forums and forum discussions attract people who have different mindsets, so it's hard to presume what fraction of the player base which people are when they post here.

On my server though I have seen that all people I've played with - and I never discussed group loot rules with them - seem to share opinion that need is for player's character. For companions you can use need IF you ask before and no one else need it. From what I've seen the people are reasonable and make no problem of other people taking need if they don't need item for their character.
^^^
This

I have same experiences on my current server and the 6 months of beta I played. Realizing that these forums are skewed and do not proportionally represent the actual player community is key.

VanorDM's Avatar


VanorDM
01.27.2012 , 03:15 PM | #1105
Quote: Originally Posted by Ancaglon View Post
Ultimately, however, trying to draw any such conclusions from the volume of posts here is an exercise in futility.
No not really. It's quite easy to draw the conclusion that not everyone feels the same way.

Galbatorrix's Avatar


Galbatorrix
01.27.2012 , 03:16 PM | #1106
Quote: Originally Posted by ispanolfw View Post
Then present it at the beginning so they can leave if they disagree. It's rather simple, you may not agree with it, but don't be silent then boot them, badmouth them, whatever because they did what they felt was right for them, and nothing was said prior so they could drop and let you find someone else.

Stop telling people what they should and shouldn't do. If it's your right to need things over the people in the group that can use them as an upgrade, it's their right to boot you, badmouth you, get guilds to black list you and anything else they want to do to you.


Start playing right and those things won't happen.

Loendar's Avatar


Loendar
01.27.2012 , 03:16 PM | #1107
Quote: Originally Posted by ispanolfw View Post
Then present it at the beginning so they can leave if they disagree. It's rather simple, you may not agree with it, but don't be silent then boot them, badmouth them, whatever because they did what they felt was right for them, and nothing was said prior so they could drop and let you find someone else.
Oh - don't get me wrong. I haven't run into this issue at all as I don't do PUG's for the very reasons being related here. I play with Guild members that I know are playing the game to further their characters and the Guild as a whole.

If I were in a PUG I would ask up front what was acceptable and make my decisions based on that and if it were a group dedicated to color swatches and looking pretty I would bow out gracefully.

Creed_Buhallin's Avatar


Creed_Buhallin
01.27.2012 , 03:16 PM | #1108
Quote: Originally Posted by Galbatorrix View Post
Your Logic is not sound, sir. In fact, it's down right ridiculous. Playing dress up is fun and all, but it won't help you while questing. Stat boosts will. Nice troll attempt though.
No troll.

Believe it or not, my wife actually likes playing dress up. She cares less about the stats than she does about how something looks. She'll happily progress a little slower, or wait another level before we can take down that particular quest, if it means she's got a look she likes.

By your response, I can only assume that you're completely unfamiliar with women, and have certainly never been blessed with one who games with you. And that's before we even touch on roleplayers and the like, to whom appearance is equally important.

The fact that you cannot see beyond your preferred playstyle explains fully and completely why you cannot see beyond your need for loot priority. You won't even acknowledge the existence of other priorities - how could you possibly respect them?

ispanolfw's Avatar


ispanolfw
01.27.2012 , 03:17 PM | #1109
Quote: Originally Posted by Galbatorrix View Post
I solute you sir. You play the game the right way.
The right way.... so now you decide what is right and wrong? Some have said the people with the minority view should bring it up for discussion prior to killing anything. I will say those who have a view different from what the game allows should bring it up. Since if they see the system says this, and they follow that, but all of a sudden they roll and win something they want, they get booted, called names and the like. If you have the differing view to what the game has in place, YOU are the more able candidate to bring it up.

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
01.27.2012 , 03:17 PM | #1110
Quote: Originally Posted by Jigsaw-Complex View Post
BH wearing Sith robes? Wrong.

Jedi wearing smuggler hat? Wrong.

Smuggler wearing Inquisitor robes? Wrong.

It's a cop out to say that orange gear is up for grabs. It's whoever wants needs it, then whoever can wear it, then whoever wants it. That's how it goes.
No, there is no need. Stop lying to your self. You don't NEED it. You WANT it.

It goes to whoever wants it. Period. You don't get to dictate what want is valid and what isn't.