Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

We demand cross server pvp NOW!

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > PvP
We demand cross server pvp NOW!

Rocktop's Avatar


Rocktop
01.19.2012 , 07:59 AM | #151
Cross server pvp is a no go plain and simple.
Character progression on servers is totally unique to that server. Stop complaining, and just enjoy the game.
“Don’t call me a mindless philosopher, you overweight glob of grease.”

QuiLink's Avatar


QuiLink
01.19.2012 , 08:00 AM | #152
PvPhers are so dramatic.

Marrio's Avatar


Marrio
01.19.2012 , 08:03 AM | #153
"Stop complaining, and just enjoy the game."

Pretty sure they need an answer to 5 hour queue times.. other than "shut up QQ"

QuiLink's Avatar


QuiLink
01.19.2012 , 08:08 AM | #154
Quote: Originally Posted by Marrio View Post
"Stop complaining, and just enjoy the game."

Pretty sure they need an answer to 5 hour queue times.. other than "shut up QQ"
5 hour ques huh? Don't believe it - exaggerated.

Jeido's Avatar


Jeido
01.19.2012 , 08:08 AM | #155
To answer the OP, no I do not want cross server queues immediately, nor do I want them ever. Having a server community is something that I enjoy greatly, especially considering the potential the World PvP has.

When it's server-restricted then you can instantly recognize some guilds. If you lose to that guild, you know to watch out for them. If you encounter said guilds in World PvP and can kill them, then it grants immediate satisfaction. Guild Rivalries are great, and they are most easily formed when you have people from your actual server fighting one another!

Unfortunately I did see a post a while back saying that they plan to implement cross-server queues at some point, so there's nothing I can do about that. However, I wish they would allow servers to choose whether or not they wanted to be included in the cross-server list. Personally, I don't think my server would want to be. Queue times aren't that long long (1-5min) for 4 man premades, so why kill our community for something we don't need?

tldr; noty OP.

Dogfatherxx's Avatar


Dogfatherxx
01.19.2012 , 08:10 AM | #156
I for one do not demand this and demand the opposite. I like seeing people I recognize on my team or against me. Your proposed change would just chip away at the sense of community that exists now.

kaseoi's Avatar


kaseoi
01.19.2012 , 08:10 AM | #157
Quote: Originally Posted by spicycookie View Post
Should have played a high pop server and deal with the Ques for couple weeks for long term survivability.
and who says that the person didn't?

Suuke's Avatar


Suuke
01.19.2012 , 08:11 AM | #158
No cross server pvp.

fenrylwizard's Avatar


fenrylwizard
01.19.2012 , 08:11 AM | #159
Quote: Originally Posted by QuiLink View Post
5 hour ques huh? Don't believe it - exaggerated.
on my servers its way above 5 hours, simply because there are roughly 20 lvl 50s from each side.. meaning aside from a couple of hours a day there is no warzone.

zagon's Avatar


zagon
01.19.2012 , 08:18 AM | #160
Quote: Originally Posted by Tic- View Post
I haven't added any, but then again, i rarely do that anyhow. i sure do know a lot of them when we get in together though.

The ones that give up? I keep them in mind when they are looking for a healer in general chat, just like the ones that afk..

cross server queus, i cant do that anymore.... I like my community as is, thanks.
I can't for the life of me see how this is bad, if you want to play a warzone / flashpoint with friends you go ahead and ask them. Done deal. You rarely add new folks to your friends list, so what on God's green earth is community destroying about letting people like me with less time on their hands get value for the few hours we have available?

It's in no way, shape or form detrimental to your community, but it makes the game playable for people like me.

I could add "are my $15 worth less than yours", but that would bombastic and silly

Edit:

I see replies "No cross server" etc.
What I want to know is why?
What good arguments do you have to support that it "destroys community"?

Just stating that it "destroys community" is not a good (or infact a valid) argument.