Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

1-49 Warzones are AMAZING now

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > PvP
1-49 Warzones are AMAZING now

UltimateKrucible's Avatar


UltimateKrucible
01.19.2012 , 06:07 AM | #181
Sooooooo glad I took my time as I lvl'd

My main's onlt 26 and my alt's only 11 ..... so many good times a'comin in PvP now the 50s have gone!

Sookster's Avatar


Sookster
01.19.2012 , 06:10 AM | #182
Playing on my non 50's, yes WZ's are way more fun. A few Huttball matches where the ball never left the middle and changed hands several times a minute were good laughs, one match ended 0-0. But Voidstar is much more variable now but we get the occasional players that don't know what they're doing.
Now that GoergZoeller is gone, buff operative.
SWTOR going F2P, now playing SWGemu.

KacperSpala's Avatar


KacperSpala
01.19.2012 , 06:11 AM | #183
Yea, please let us turn off XP gain, so we can play PvP without ubergrinding pathetic stat-gear. Aside from the fact, the warzones now are hell lot of a fun, that actually rewards teamplay and real effort. Good job on that, shame it came soooooo late.

Mythic did warhammer with proper brackets from the get go, you should learn for christ sake.
Also, pvp stat, i mean really ? It has nothing to do with what pvp should be about - skill, teamplay, strategy, NOT PvE/P grinding gear for PvP stats, people get a grip already.

Again back to DAoC RvR system - give people abilities for renown ranks, instead of gear. Abilities must be used with head to gain win/kill, gear/stats is just plain dumbing the gameplay. With additional PvP abilities @ renown ranks you also make more character builds possible...

Also to not let the PvE crowd back, you could make alternative system for Raiding Valor, and Raiding Skills (PvE skills) to choose from instead of gear.....

Example - PvP skill - additional CC break (works in PvE normally, as CC break)
Example - PvE skill - additional Taunt (works in PvP normally, as taunt)
...

Also the brackets -
10-25, 25-49, 50. Please.
"Only two things are infinite - universe, and stupidity, but i am not sure about the first one."

Albert Einstein

joranvdsloot's Avatar


joranvdsloot
01.19.2012 , 06:24 AM | #184
This has been a huge improvement, the level 50s in pvp gear where just to hard to fight as a low char but now its a lot better and more fun!

It was even sad to see some of these level 50s acting like ***** in the warzones and talking down on lowbies because they tought they where so good at the game! >_<

Ian_Blackmoor's Avatar


Ian_Blackmoor
01.19.2012 , 06:29 AM | #185
Just want to say I had a blast today with my lvl 29 gunslinger. I only had time for 8 matches 4 of of them wins. Each match was very close (execpt for the first hutt ball one were my pug lost 6 - 0), in most of the matches it was hard to know who was going to win untill right at the end.

I purposely stayed away from pvp when I knew 50's would be in my bracket and I had a look at the gear they could use. I believe a lot of other players may have done the same and that this bracket system will encourage more pvp. At 3:00am I joind the pvp queue and in under 3 minutes I had a match, after each match it took anywhere from 30 seconds to 2 minutes to get into the next match.

And as far as hitting 50 and having no gear compared to the 50's who have been there for awhile .... not bothered by it. You get rewards even when you lose so I'll be able to be on equal footing gear wise eventually.

Although I do think it'd be better if pvp and pve gear were the same.

dnomz's Avatar


dnomz
01.19.2012 , 06:31 AM | #186
I'm level 47 now, wish we didn't gain XP from Warzones. I don't want to face a premade Champions geared Imperial group anymore.

Finally PvP is enjoyable.

Earlier Republic lost 9 out of 10 matches. Now we win 9 out of 10. Just goes to show that even in this game the baddies are overpopulated and when it comes to equal strength, the good guys are better.

deltaminus's Avatar


deltaminus
01.19.2012 , 06:33 AM | #187
No they aren't. I liked playing with 50s as they actually tried to achieve the in game objectives instead of sitting in a corner like headless chickens... while the enemy team keeps scoring.

Now I have to wait till 50 before I get good games again.

I'm sure removing the 50s appeals to the faceroll casual crowd, but I never liked getting spoon fed to begin with.

Dalnar's Avatar


Dalnar
01.19.2012 , 06:35 AM | #188
Quote: Originally Posted by deltaminus View Post
No they aren't. I liked playing with 50s as they actually tried to achieve the in game objectives instead of sitting in a corner like headless chickens... while the enemy team keeps scoring.

Now I have to wait till 50 before I get good games again.
Actually, I see a lot more people trying now, than before. Because the "they have more 50s its hopeless" argument is gone.

deltaminus's Avatar


deltaminus
01.19.2012 , 06:38 AM | #189
Quote: Originally Posted by Dalnar View Post
Actually, I see a lot more people trying now, than before. Because the "they have more 50s its hopeless" argument is gone.
And I've had the opposite. People tried when there where 50s in the game. Now that there are no 50s I somehow keep getting the teams of people that don't even try to meet the objectives.

My ques have also increased in length.

dnomz's Avatar


dnomz
01.19.2012 , 06:39 AM | #190
Are you by any chance an Imperial?

Imperials got carried by the 50s all the time. Now they suck hard.