Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Why PvP is never fun in MMOs

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > PvP
Why PvP is never fun in MMOs

AGoldCrayon's Avatar


AGoldCrayon
01.16.2012 , 02:17 AM | #41
Quote: Originally Posted by rainingcrazy View Post
Ya know, back in the day, long ago, when many felt pvp was at it's best in wow, there were no rewards. A bunch of idgits would spend all evening fighting over Tarren Mill. No reward, nothing. Many, in fact, argue that organized pvp (BG's) ruined it. I don't exactly agree with that but it was fun times.
Even after BG's were introduced, we'd still have world pvp. It wasn't really till arenas that world pvp seemed to die off. If they remove expertise, they simply need to elevate the stats of the pvp gear to that of pve progression stuff.

As nice as it would be to have a pvp system that was class based, that horse left the barn, we're gonna have to work within the system we have.

MilesMcLeod's Avatar


MilesMcLeod
01.16.2012 , 02:17 AM | #42
Quote: Originally Posted by rainingcrazy View Post
Ya know, back in the day, long ago, when many felt pvp was at it's best in wow, there were no rewards. A bunch of idgits would spend all evening fighting over Tarren Mill. No reward, nothing. Many, in fact, argue that organized pvp (BG's) ruined it. I don't exactly agree with that but it was fun times.
I think that's about right. Earning gear from PvP'ing was the starting point for the path that lead us here today. To systems where you have to grind to even have a chance at survival a match. It's a really lazy way of doing it, and I don't really see why gaming companies keep falling into the same hole every MMO that comes out.

The formula shouldn't be to grind out gear and win against those who don't. The formula should be based on skill, hence why similarly geared people should be grouped together.

I think this is why Arena in WoW works so well.

MilesMcLeod's Avatar


MilesMcLeod
01.16.2012 , 02:19 AM | #43
Quote: Originally Posted by tindin View Post
this i think is what the op is trying to get at but for some reason keeps talking about valor..
Do you really not see the correlation between valor level and gear?

JohraTon's Avatar


JohraTon
01.16.2012 , 02:21 AM | #44
I'm going to guess 1 of 2 things has happened to cause this post.

1) Your a 50 who's opened a few bags to find nothing and are annoyed at the system

2) Your a low level who's getting smashed by 50's with PvP gear

In the case of point 1, tough, welcome to the club. Loads of players dislike the current award system but RNG is so common in so many RPG's I'm seriously wondering if many had any idea what they were getting in for. The only problem I currently see with it is being stuck with useless spares which you'll never use. Someone else could be using them.

For 2, could you not have waited till Tuesday? Valor really has nothing to do with your argument, since you unlock nothing at 50 valor. Even getting rid of the 50's from warzones and you could still find 49 Val's in there with you. Your problem is down to expertise and has nothing to do with valor at all. Quite a few 50 valor players have less champion gear than those in the 30's.

People complaining here seem to think every class at every level should have a fair chance 1 on 1 with any other class. Apart from being massively unrealistic and practically impossible to implement that's not the objective. The PvP warzones are a team game and even level 10's have a part to play but if you think your part is to go 1 on 1 the biggest most geared level 50 in the match then your mistaken.

If you get rid of expertise they need to boost the rest of the stats to match the PvE gear otherwise your handing an advantage to the hardcore raiders which is exactly why expertise exists in the first place.
Jedi Covenant
Rhigus - Juggernaut
<Deceptìcons>

IxXDreamerXxI's Avatar


IxXDreamerXxI
01.16.2012 , 02:22 AM | #45
What happened to gaining skills/spells/moves as progression in pvp, man nothing has topped gw1 pvp system. And bringing only 8 skills into a fight meant that you weren't gonna be able to control dps tank and heal all at once (I think trooper can do this but i might just be QQing)

(completely aware of the FotM builds and cheese builds, at least individual skills could be nerfed into the ground without breaking the game.)
Check it, I'm nothing less than a thug//
Got slugs-hit ya mug-leave a ya skull spaced out like a baseball glove//

tindin's Avatar


tindin
01.16.2012 , 02:22 AM | #46
Quote: Originally Posted by MilesMcLeod View Post
Do you really not see the correlation between valor level and gear?
not realy i have alvl 17 thats i valor rank 20ish. so realy the only correlation between the 2 is when when valor rank = xp lvl /wz comms = a nice peace of gear....

buttom line gear

SandTrout's Avatar


SandTrout
01.16.2012 , 02:23 AM | #47
Quote: Originally Posted by AGoldCrayon View Post
Even after BG's were introduced, we'd still have world pvp. It wasn't really till arenas that world pvp seemed to die off. If they remove expertise, they simply need to elevate the stats of the pvp gear to that of pve progression stuff.

As nice as it would be to have a pvp system that was class based, that horse left the barn, we're gonna have to work within the system we have.
I'm SandTrout, and I support this message.
Nerf not, lest ye be nerfed.

Jurisnoctis's Avatar


Jurisnoctis
01.16.2012 , 02:23 AM | #48
Quote: Originally Posted by SandTrout View Post
So, what you're saying here is that expertise and gear do nothing except segregate the population?
What I'm saying is gear is the least important thing in PvP, only over looks.

I've been in arena teams recently hitting max level with 300 resil vs a team with 3000+ resil.

My team won. Gear helps bads kill bads. Good players WILL stomp you anyway.

Winning WZs must have a reward. Yay credits. If you pvp you don't really need em. Yay valor ranks for e-peen.

What I'm saying is the reward is gear, and in all honesty it's a minimal one.

If you want a PvP scenario where gear is equivalent, do top level PvP, such as Tournament rounds in WoW (example), where all gear is equal.



I'd like to argue your argument for PvE in which case. Give me top PvE gear so I can kill the PvE bosses as well as anyone else can, not limited by my time investment.

That, is dumb.

If you're given top gear, ALL rewards should be turned off. Maybe you want a setting? "Give me full top-level PvP/PvE gear and disable all rewards/titles/loot"?

Wheeeee pointlessness. Do you disagree? Yay, I'm not being ranked in WZs as they are now, but I want equal gear as if it's a serious competition when it's not because I know for a fact a 23 can kill 50s in 4+ pieces of champion gear because I HAVE PERSONALLY DONE IT.
Quote: Originally Posted by DiabloWalker View Post
Your huttball throw button is there, but isn't even binded.
Quote: Originally Posted by Electroflux View Post
Why would I need to bind it?

Rakimou's Avatar


Rakimou
01.16.2012 , 02:23 AM | #49
Quote: Originally Posted by E_c_c_e View Post
I can't wait for GW2 because it's being hyped to such a ridiculously extreme degree that it will never ever live up to the standards it would have to fulfill...

And where did they say that PvP will be gear independent ?
It's been mentioned several times in various QAs and interviews. When you enter a 5v5 match you get your standard PVP gear set. It's course it may be changed in future, since GW2 just launched into beta.

Quote:
If they do it..we'll see...but I like being rewarded for time spent PvP'ing...isn't the gear hunt one of the main aspects of any MMO these days ? Carrot on a stick works...why change a winning team ? :P
Gear is the main aspect of PVE. I firmly believe it shouldn't play such a huge role in PVP.

Quote:
And I love how everything is a WoW clone...truly WoW was the first ever MMO !!!
WoW was the first MMO that introduced this kind of PVP. PVE-wise every game is good ol' Everquest.

Quote:
And you know what...I'm currently grinding PvP gear...and it does wonders to my skills...I get more gear, my actions are more fluid (bar ability delay *sigh*) and I generally learn how to counter other classes and when to use what CD ...If I face a person 1on1 (same gear lvl) it gets really interesting usually
Good to hear. But what if you didn't grind your gear and just played for fun. What would change?

AGoldCrayon's Avatar


AGoldCrayon
01.16.2012 , 02:23 AM | #50
Quote: Originally Posted by IxXDreamerXxI View Post
Once again you are failing to comprehend. The when the Op spoke of valor levels they were suggesting that it isnt fair for someone valor 1 to have to fight a valor level 50. You supported this suggestion with your post but, your initial statement would promote a disagreeable view on your part.

So which is it, do you agree or disagree that people of equal valor level (experience) should be facing only each other ?

and/or

Do you agree or disagree that players of equal gear level should be facing only each other?

and/or

something i missed?
Valor =/= Gear. As for what I want, I could care less. I did just fine in the BG's leveling up in oranges and blues against 50's in cent/champ/battlemaster gear. And when I say 'fine', I mean I preformed up to my expectations. I didn't always win, but I wasn't always immediately crushed either.

I personally see no problem with letting people without expertise fight those with expertise, so long as expertise does not create a gulf that is too large to reasonably gap. Now, as for the valor question, I see no reason why brackets should be based on valor either. You'll inevitably have mostly empty brackets at lower levels, as everyone progresses in valor.

tl;dr, I trust BW to make needed changes as they gather metrics, and the OP is unduly whining.