Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

is BW ever going to address the horrendous load times?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
is BW ever going to address the horrendous load times?

Chevex's Avatar


Chevex
01.13.2012 , 04:24 PM | #11
Quote: Originally Posted by Dirtybomb View Post
I haven't had this problem, but I would bet this would more likely be due to HDD speeds. The whole game isn't stored in memory, so all of the necessary textures and such for whatever zone you are heading to have to be loaded in from the HDD. Maybe one of you engineer guru's can chime in.
This. HDD speeds greatly affect loading times. Solid State for the win.

KrazieFox's Avatar


KrazieFox
01.13.2012 , 04:24 PM | #12
Quote: Originally Posted by Drakos View Post
Load screens make me not want to leave planets.

I agree - I tend to stay on one planet for as long as possible before having to move, simply because I don't want to have to sit at a Load Screen.

Reminds me of Star Wars Galaxies, back in 2004 on an old laptop, Shuttle Load times meant I could use the bathroom & make a drink & arrive back in my chair 5 - 10 minutes later s the load screen ended ...

... fortunately SWTOR isn't that bad, but a minute or two easily.
".... just want to have fun, ..." - Cyndi Lauper, 1983

Jaick's Avatar


Jaick
01.13.2012 , 04:25 PM | #13
Quote: Originally Posted by einsoff View Post
going from a warzone back to a planet takes over a minute with 24 gigs of RAM. Will this ever be addressed or is this working as intended as a time sink?
The heck?

Load times are 15 seconds TOPS for me.

DrkCntry's Avatar


DrkCntry
01.13.2012 , 04:26 PM | #14
Quote: Originally Posted by monjiay View Post
BTW, to other posters, it makes no difference what your connection is. The planet is loaded from your hard drive, not Bioware's servers.
That may or may not be correct.

The load times are not for loading planets, it's for transitioning your character from one cluster to the next, since the planets are not on the same ones.

While the graphical assets may be on your system, the world data is not.

Baracca's Avatar


Baracca
01.13.2012 , 04:26 PM | #15
Alderaan is really bad and so is Taris. I have SSD driver so i notice it's much faster than my friend's PC but I agree. A helpful tweak would be to have the planet's spaceport elevators load you right into the ship and dump the whole hangar zone.

Kerraii's Avatar


Kerraii
01.13.2012 , 04:27 PM | #16
Quote: Originally Posted by Drakos View Post
I think it's a "working as intended" server issue. Load screens make me not want to leave planets.
This is not working AS INTENDED. It may be working as is but I am sure they would like load times faster.

This issue is a very big annoyance to many players.
Those that Play PvP and are constantly bouncing from a planet that they are doing daily quests and Pvp for warzones.

I site belsavis as the big offender as I am doing level 50 daily quests, there are 11 that can be done a day.
If I am in a queue for a warzone and doing the dailies it become a pain in the butt when I finish a warzone and have to wait for Belsavis to load.. almost a minute.
You may say that's not long... but in 2012 IT IS LONG...it should be maybe 10 seconds , and should be less.
If I am on Belsavis and loading to the warzone it takes maybe 10 seconds. Unless I get crashed to character screen...another big issue.

EABW get the load times shortened. This is a poor design on your part.
There is hardly any players on these planets... maybe 300 at peak... Other games have similar numbers for a zone... this is a planet with 4-5 zones.

KrazieFox's Avatar


KrazieFox
01.14.2012 , 08:20 AM | #17
It is definitely not 'Game Breaking' & I would rather the dev's focus on more important things first, but I would appreciate them looking at the load times for some people.

Is it really the fact that the game/loading is optimized for Solid State Drives? Considering the dev's wanted SW:TOR to be as accessible to as many people/machines as World of Warcraft I'd say that was rather short sighted.

However, it does not ruin my game play - I am used to these load screen times from days of yore with City of Heroes (which was actually a little faster) & Star Wars Galaxies. Back 5 or 6 years ago.
".... just want to have fun, ..." - Cyndi Lauper, 1983

LeSamourai's Avatar


LeSamourai
01.14.2012 , 08:22 AM | #18
Quote: Originally Posted by Drakos View Post
I think it's a "working as intended" server issue. Load screens make me not want to leave planets.
They make me not want to do ANYTHING anymore honestly. I think I'm going to start timing them. I'd bet they account for at LEAST 15% of my playtime (same goes for useless running between quests/fleet)

Nague's Avatar


Nague
01.14.2012 , 08:31 AM | #19
the worst are all the elevators and stuff that you have to go trough when enetering or leaving a planet.

You know, those that you click, then your char gets ported to the new area that you can clearly see for a second and THEN your screen goes black for 10 seconds while it plays some elevator sound.




eat a dick bioware, i am not paying you a monthly sub to mock me.
.

WarheartZero's Avatar


WarheartZero
01.14.2012 , 08:32 AM | #20
Uh...have you seen the size of these stages lol. Yeah it takes a long time. perfect time to go to the bathroom or grab a drink. They may optimize the assets better in future but I bet it will still be long. And I use a SSD. It's a lot of info to pull and load in memory.

Quote: Originally Posted by Nague View Post
the worst are all the elevators and stuff that you have to go trough when enetering or leaving a planet.

You know, those that you click, then your char gets ported to the new area that you can clearly see for a second and THEN your screen goes black for 10 seconds while it plays some elevator sound.




eat a dick bioware, i am not paying you a monthly sub to mock me.

Not sure w tf your talking about lol. But I had a normal HD and a SSD for this game, never had a 10sec screen for my elevators. And I'm on a "heavy" cap server. Sounds like classic issue of blaming Bioware for your crappy hardware setup.