Please allow dual spec or cap respec costs.

STAR WARS: The Old Republic
Please allow dual spec or cap respec costs.

Page 38 of 101 « First < 28 36 37 38 39 40 48 88 > Last »

Sparckus

01.05.2012 , 02:23 PM \| #371
Quote: Originally Posted by salamanderx I do, I usually do quite well. Number of respecs for me? Zero. But are you playing as a tank or any other build that is significantly geared towards PvE? If you are then your builds not much use to your team.

Sicknss

01.05.2012 , 02:23 PM \| #372
Quote: Originally Posted by salamanderx I do all that with one spec. Whats your point? 100% of the time you're 70% useful. Congrats.

General_Gato

01.05.2012 , 02:24 PM \| #373
Quote: Originally Posted by Guarrand So basicly ... it was hard, but you managed.... but you dont like things to be difficult so you want dualspec to make it easy. PLEASE BIOWARE... DONT MAKE THIS WoW 2 !!!!!! ... Don't make the game to easy. it's easy-going already... I think you're confusing "hard" with "extremely time consuming"

Saber_Six

01.05.2012 , 02:24 PM \| #374
Quote: Originally Posted by Sparckus Do you play regular PvP? This is irrelevant. This is an argument for PVP only dual-spec. Funny how the "need" for dual spec'ing morphs. First it is the need for tanks and healers and now suddenly it's all about PVP.

Sparckus

01.05.2012 , 02:25 PM \| #375
Quote: Originally Posted by Sicknss My goal is to make at least one person laugh with every post. I think this game has a lot of promise, I think it's very good and I think most people are whining unnecessarily. There is still much room for improvement and I expect it to happen. I'm fairly certain that not implementing multi spec would cost more subscriptions than implementing it would. You sir have been quite an entertaining read thus far, thank you for your positive contributions to this thread /highfive* * No this is NOT sarcasm

Deewe

01.05.2012 , 02:25 PM \| #376
Quote: Originally Posted by salamanderx I do all that with one spec. Whats your point? Optimization. You can't be be top notch in your class/role without having a fine tuned template. You might be good in one of the roles but fair, at best, in the other 2.
----- [HOW_TO] Mouse look toogle

Spynnal

01.05.2012 , 02:26 PM \| #377
Quote: Originally Posted by Amiracle Nope, my solution is to spend the money on things I want and not on things I don't hoping I can convince someone to change it later into the thing I want. It was pretty simple really, no hidden agenda. An excellent reply. However, having played through Lotro and some other MMO's, they are constantly evolving beasts that never remain the same. Hope it continues to be what you want from it, but expect it to progress as it moves forward. They all seem to.

Saber_Six

01.05.2012 , 02:27 PM \| #378
Quote: Originally Posted by Sicknss "Dual Speccing is something we want to add soon after launch." If you are so sure it is coming, why are you posting so voraciously for it? Just sit back and wait for the inevitable.

Sicknss

01.05.2012 , 02:28 PM \| #379
Quote: Originally Posted by Saber_Six This is irrelevant. This is an argument for PVP only dual-spec. Funny how the "need" for dual spec'ing morphs. First it is the need for tanks and healers and now suddenly it's all about PVP. Actually, the OP gives several examples, PVP being just one. Reading is your friend.

Valkirus

01.05.2012 , 02:28 PM \| #380
Quote: Originally Posted by Deewe Maybe some of us want to be able to: 1) Solo 2) Group PvE 3) PvP With the same class efficiently. Dual specs is the solution, and no it's not cheating. Now about alts before you say so: I already have 5 chars and counting. So please don't lecture me Your right..it's not cheating if the developers add it to the game. But it is a issue which can make the game easier and removes some of the tough choices in the game. Because of this..some have issues with dual speccing. Such as myself. We all know what happend to one MMO which started making a lot of changes which made the game easier.
Trust is something which is earned.

Page 38 of 101 « First < 28 36 37 38 39 40 48 88 > Last »

Closed Thread

STAR WARS: The Old Republic

LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

You are about to leave this website...

This page is not meant to keep you from following the link you've clicked on. It is just a warning that you are about to leave this website. To go to this page, click the link below.

If you do not wish to follow this link, simply
close this message.

The statements and opinions expressed on these websites are solely those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, nor are they endorsed by Bioware, LucasArts, and its licensors do not guarantee the accuracy of, and are in no way responsible for any content on these websites.

Close Continue