Cancel your subscription if your unhappy with PVP

STAR WARS: The Old Republic
Cancel your subscription if your unhappy with PVP

Page 47 of 79 « First < 37 45 46 47 48 49 57 > Last »

Ozlock

01.03.2012 , 08:39 AM \| #461
I've played lots of mmos with pvp (UO, EQ, SWG, DAOC, Shadowbane, Wow, Vanguard) and I have beta tested TOR since August. Is TOR pvp perfect? I dunno what that would even be.... Is it fun? For me, oh yeah it is. I will be keeping my sub. Hope your guys find the game your looking for.

Gamerhog

01.03.2012 , 08:48 AM \| #462
Consider how many flaws most MMO's have at launch, I'd say Bioware is doing a damn good job. As far as Warzones are concerned.. if you recall.. there wasn't even ANY type of Battleground when WoW launched. Keep in mind this game isn't a 7 year old polished gem. And if you don't have the patience, good riddance, because this is the smoothest launch of any MMO I've seen.

MuteLunatic

01.03.2012 , 08:59 AM \| #463
I'm unhappy and I canceled. I don't want to fight a brick wall now. I don't want to have my level 50 matches determined by who has less low level characters in it. I don't want people who are roflstomping me now to have an incredible gear advantage due to easy wins. Bolstering is cool. Making level 50s gods and allowing them to fight mortals is not.

oblongship

01.03.2012 , 09:06 AM \| #464
Quote: Originally Posted by Gamerhog Consider how many flaws most MMO's have at launch, I'd say Bioware is doing a damn good job. As far as Warzones are concerned.. if you recall.. there wasn't even ANY type of Battleground when WoW launched. Keep in mind this game isn't a 7 year old polished gem. And if you don't have the patience, good riddance, because this is the smoothest launch of any MMO I've seen. This argument is pathetic and tired. WoW didn't launch with BG's 7 years ago you are right. But last time I checked this wasn't 7 years ago. Anything released currently must be in line or better than the current products not 7 years ago. Launching with BGs is a STANDARD now, so stop with this tired pathetic excuse for an argument.

SundialX

01.03.2012 , 09:10 AM \| #465
"We have an entire team dedicated to adding content and features to player vs. player. We have some of the most experienced PvP developers in the world on this team. So far very few people have seen, or know much about the stunning Open World PVP on Ilum" - Bioware
"We have an entire team dedicated to adding content and features to player vs. player. We have some of the most experienced PvP developers in the world on this team. So far very few people have seen, or know much about the stunning Open World PVP on Ilum" - Bioware

sunsu

01.03.2012 , 09:41 AM \| #466
Quote: Originally Posted by oblongship This argument is pathetic and tired. WoW didn't launch with BG's 7 years ago you are right. But last time I checked this wasn't 7 years ago. Anything released currently must be in line or better than the current products not 7 years ago. Launching with BGs is a STANDARD now, so stop with this tired pathetic excuse for an argument. ^^This X1000 Please sticky this..

OGPurps

01.03.2012 , 09:43 AM \| #467
/cancel

ShadowKastar

01.03.2012 , 09:44 AM \| #468
Quote: Originally Posted by oblongship This argument is pathetic and tired. WoW didn't launch with BG's 7 years ago you are right. But last time I checked this wasn't 7 years ago. Anything released currently must be in line or better than the current products not 7 years ago. Launching with BGs is a STANDARD now, so stop with this tired pathetic excuse for an argument. Agree with this completely. With any new product or service you have to release and compete with the current products/services. You need to improve upon the current or at least provide the same default services. This is what ppl are used too and expect this day and age.

ShadowKastar

01.03.2012 , 09:53 AM \| #469
so what level can I expect to see some open world PVP?

TOR_Archimedes

01.03.2012 , 09:55 AM \| #470
Quote: Originally Posted by oblongship This argument is pathetic and tired. WoW didn't launch with BG's 7 years ago you are right. But last time I checked this wasn't 7 years ago. Anything released currently must be in line or better than the current products not 7 years ago. Launching with BGs is a STANDARD now, so stop with this tired pathetic excuse for an argument. /sign

Page 47 of 79 « First < 37 45 46 47 48 49 57 > Last »

Closed Thread

STAR WARS: The Old Republic

LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

You are about to leave this website...

This page is not meant to keep you from following the link you've clicked on. It is just a warning that you are about to leave this website. To go to this page, click the link below.

If you do not wish to follow this link, simply
close this message.

The statements and opinions expressed on these websites are solely those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, nor are they endorsed by Bioware, LucasArts, and its licensors do not guarantee the accuracy of, and are in no way responsible for any content on these websites.

Close Continue