Dalwhinnie Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 (edited) I RE 25 Blue Reflex Augment 9 's in a row. I believe this schematic is bugged. Edited May 6, 2012 by Dalwhinnie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distracted Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 (edited) I RE 25 Blue Reflex Augment 9's in a row. I believe this schematic is bugged. A 20% chance to learn a new schematic means each individual mod you RE has a 20% chance. It doesn't mean that RE'ing 5 of them will definately give you the schematic. In other words, each time you RE one, you have an 80% chance to fail. Each. Time. You could RE 10000 of them & still never get it, just depends on the RNG. Edited May 6, 2012 by Distracted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PiOPah Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 A 20% chance to learn a new schematic means each individual mod you RE has a 20% chance. It doesn't mean that RE'ing 5 of them will definately give you the schematic. In other words, each time you RE one, you have an 80% chance to fail. Each. Time. You could RE 10000 of them & still never get it, just depends on the RNG. I understand the statistics concept but I agree with the first post..I broke over 30 of the Reflex augments to get the first upgrade. The odds of NOT getting the schematic after 30 tries at 1:5 each go is phenominally low!! like...winning the lottery low...yes it is possible I was just really really unlucky (no guarantee that any will be "the winner") but I'm pretty sure the 20% quoted is rubbish...5% maybe 8% would fit the practical results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asbalana Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 I understand the statistics concept but I agree with the first post..I broke over 30 of the Reflex augments to get the first upgrade. The odds of NOT getting the schematic after 30 tries at 1:5 each go is phenominally low!! like...winning the lottery low...yes it is possible I was just really really unlucky (no guarantee that any will be "the winner") but I'm pretty sure the 20% quoted is rubbish...5% maybe 8% would fit the practical results LOL, Incoming Prepare to be slimed. Acutually, a number of people in this section keep spreadsheets of their RE attempts and can show that RE is not bugged, but conforms to the delcared percentages in the loooooooooooooong run. The debate devolved into whether the system which has the possibility of loooooooooooong loooooooooooooong fail runs that seem to occur all to often, actually sucks. Opinion is divided on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_land Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 why re that augment anyways? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eartharioch Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 I understand the statistics concept but I agree with the first post..I broke over 30 of the Reflex augments to get the first upgrade. The odds of NOT getting the schematic after 30 tries at 1:5 each go is phenominally low!! like...winning the lottery low...yes it is possible I was just really really unlucky (no guarantee that any will be "the winner") but I'm pretty sure the 20% quoted is rubbish...5% maybe 8% would fit the practical results You do realize that even with very low odds of winning, some people actually *do* win the lottery, don't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psandak Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 I understand the statistics concept but I agree with the first post..I broke over 30 of the Reflex augments to get the first upgrade. The odds of NOT getting the schematic after 30 tries at 1:5 each go is phenominally low!! like...winning the lottery low...yes it is possible I was just really really unlucky (no guarantee that any will be "the winner") but I'm pretty sure the 20% quoted is rubbish...5% maybe 8% would fit the practical results Can we say extreme hyperbole? Or you do not know statistics as well as you claim. The odds of 30 straight failures (that means succeeding on the 31st attempt) is 0.124% or 1.24 in 1000. Winning the lottery: 1 in 157 million give or take. To hit that mark you would need to fail 85 times in a row. And in anticipation of a thread or response like this (and as proof of Asbalana's claim ), I have been tracking my RE rates for the past few weeks. 405 total items crafted 282 of those REed for schematics 65 schematics achieved RE success rate 23.05% Only 1 out of 65 schematics achieved took more than 20 attempts. Only 3 others took 10 attempts or more Did the 1 that took 23 attempts suck? Sure did! But the myriad of quick successes VASTLY outweighed that one bad experience. In a previous experiment of this kind (in March 2014), I went 41 attempts (across three different items) before succeeding. But in that same data set, I got two schematics out of my first three REs. I remember both events equally, because they both stand out. And the overall rate of success was dead on. EVERY testing cycle I have ever done on this subject has shown that long fail streaks are inevitable but their occurrences are rare in the grand scheme. Now it is a matter of convincing everyone else of this. Obviously numbers do not work, but that's all I got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawnAskham Posted June 7, 2015 Share Posted June 7, 2015 Just for laughs I went and gave this schematic a try... Reverse Engineer Green to Blue: Two attempts to learn the blue schematic Reverse engineer Blue to Purple: Seven attempts to learn the purple schematic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FerkWork Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Lol Holy Necro Batman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts