ancksunamur Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 After a long night of raiding, which to me is always fun. I'd like to give kudos to Bioware because I truely thought you wouldn't do a thing with the place. So nicely done. i maintain Dread guards is still do able, and will be attempting it as if it is. But neither of those is the point to this. You see I have a lock out problem. Cause I think it's cheap the way the current system works, but I understand it, and I think it's time for a change. I don't care if HM, and NiM share a lock out, gear comes pretty easily compared to past games. But I would amend it to, if you defeat 1 boss on HM, NiM will be locked and you would be unable to bump the next fight for it. Now if you fought 2 on NiM, you could still go and finish on HM but just wouldn't be able to go back to NiM. It makes more sense as far as a progressive raiding goes. Then leapfrogging through the place. Just a thought, thanks again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnipeAlott Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 After a long night of raiding, which to me is always fun. I'd like to give kudos to Bioware because I truely thought you wouldn't do a thing with the place. So nicely done. i maintain Dread guards is still do able, and will be attempting it as if it is. But neither of those is the point to this. You see I have a lock out problem. Cause I think it's cheap the way the current system works, but I understand it, and I think it's time for a change. I don't care if HM, and NiM share a lock out, gear comes pretty easily compared to past games. But I would amend it to, if you defeat 1 boss on HM, NiM will be locked and you would be unable to bump the next fight for it. Now if you fought 2 on NiM, you could still go and finish on HM but just wouldn't be able to go back to NiM. It makes more sense as far as a progressive raiding goes. Then leapfrogging through the place. Just a thought, thanks again I will sign this "petition". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arlon_Nabarlly Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 I'd rather just have HM and NiM be completely separate lockouts. That would fix the problem as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaunidle Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 I'd rather just have HM and NiM be completely separate lockouts. That would fix the problem as well. Very true, plus it adds to the quantity of content in the game which justifies calling NiM TfB "new" (ok new ish). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts