Liquidacid Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 so a 5 month old thread was resurrected to complain about a question already answered here and in lore multiple times? lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscad Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 so a 5 month old thread was resurrected to complain about a question already answered here and in lore multiple times? lmao To be fair since we are all posting here it isn't like we have anything better to discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Zone Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 I do not see how that shows a lack of integrity. Argue how you don't like it, but as an artist myself, the medium being worked on can change and evolve in a way that makes you want to constantly work on it. I never consider any of my creations finished works because they are not and they will not always satisfy you forever. I would argue it can even be unhealthy for the mind to let those things go but I will settle with it just shows he is will to play with art. If you are going to argue anything, argue that GL has been a hypocrite with how he acts and believes things in the past 30 years. Whether he had a change of heart as Star Wars grew past his expectations or simply has his films be the exception to his rules has more worth in arguing, imo. So, as an artist, would you go back and retcon your own work? Oh, and George IS a hypocrite from the word Go. He argues against the modification of existing movies, then turns around and says "Hey! I can do that to my movies! Herp to the derp!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidacid Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 To be fair since we are all posting here it isn't like we have anything better to discuss. meh that doesn't mean it's worth discussing... it just means we all have to much time to waste ... which is sad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscad Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 meh that doesn't mean it's worth discussing... it just means we all have to much time to waste ... which is sad The fact that we have time to waste means that we are alive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidacid Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 The fact that we have time to waste means that we are alive so people with full lives who don't have time to waste aren't alive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurojiin Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 (edited) so people with full lives who don't have time to waste aren't alive? What it really means is that people who think they're apparently the objective arbiter of the universe when it comes to what does and doesn't constitute a meaningful use of time need to pull the stick out of their backside. Not taking a shot at you, btw. Just saying... in the grand scheme of things, whether you fill your time by writing philosophical treatises or discussing whether Han shot first is largely irrelevant. Edited July 6, 2012 by Aurojiin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Zone Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 What it really means is that people who think they're apparently the objective arbiter of the universe when it comes to what does and doesn't constitute a meaningful use of time need to pull the stick out of their backside. Not taking a shot at you, btw. Just saying... in the grand scheme of things, whether you fill your time by writing philosophical treatises or discussing whether Han shot is largely irrelevant. *snap* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HellbirdIV Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Han couldn't shoot first, silly people! He didn't have a shotgun and wasn't in stealth, ergo he couldn't use Shoot First, ergo he had to shoot second. /discussion over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Zone Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Han couldn't shoot first, silly people! He didn't have a shotgun and wasn't in stealth, ergo he couldn't use Shoot First, ergo he had to shoot second. /discussion over Game Mechanics.... /facedesk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscad Posted July 7, 2012 Share Posted July 7, 2012 so people with full lives who don't have time to waste aren't alive? No I was just stating that we weren't dead and have that to be grateful for, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
undeadsithdread Posted July 7, 2012 Share Posted July 7, 2012 han did not shot first! saying that he shot first like implying that Greedo shot him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscad Posted July 7, 2012 Share Posted July 7, 2012 han did not shot first! saying that he shot first like implying that Greedo shot him. Indeed, Han is the only one that shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Zone Posted July 7, 2012 Share Posted July 7, 2012 han did not shot first! saying that he shot first like implying that Greedo shot him. Han shot first... and last... and only fired once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts