Jump to content

alexsamma

Members
  • Posts

    1,781
  • Joined

Reputation

10 Good

1 Follower

  1. Someone who has 400 wins and a 1600 rating, esp. on carry class like operative (or any tank/healer) is pretty much the opposite of a top 3 player... unless you think the RNG elements of solo ranked have such a huge impact on your rating that the RNG can greatly overwhelm your personal skill.
  2. Luck works both ways Alex, you can get a good night or two of queuing and pick up 100-200 (or more) rating. When you have a system that has any many layers of RNG as solo ranked does you're never going to eliminate the luck aspect.
  3. I think rating decay would be a better system than the win requirements since it would keep the required number of games relative to your general competition, ie: if all of the top 3 spots for shadow ended with ~120-130 games played then the fight for top 3 shadow would be competitive and rating decay would ensure that everyone had to keep playing (at least enough to to not drop out).
  4. If we assume that solo ranked is a proper indication of skill and a medium where a player has enough agency to overcome the RNG inherent in the system then it's safe to say that any good player will, eventually, rise to the top; can we agree on this? If you agree with the above then it's also safe to say that if a player achieves a top 3 rating in 50 games, then stops playing, eventually he/she will be forced to start playing again if there other highly skilled players of the same caliber that are still playing? The whole concept here is that if there are people who are capable of challenging someone's rating and they have the willpower to do so then they will eventually push high enough to unseat the player at the top and that player will be forced to resume playing in order to safeguard/re-earn their spot; this was a generally true statement in past seasons (esp. before s9) unless you played an under-performing class (such as mando back in s4/5). If someone can sit on a top 3 spot with ~20/30/40 wins for an entire season (esp. one as long as s11) and no one rises up to challenge them I think that speaks volumes about the state of solo ranked.
  5. This is a good change for people who like to play one character and a terrible change for people who like to play multiple characters. Regardless of how many games you play your rating is, simply, your rating; if the system has enough competitive players then you should be surpassed if you stop playing, if the system does not have enough competitive players then the point is mute. You've played long enough to know that sitting on rating, unless you were excessively higher than anyone else (which usually didn't happen on a "competitive" class unless you played a solid amount of games) did not work in more active seasons. Personally I don't care about top 3 titles, but when I look at some of the players that would have "earned" a top 3 title last season simply due to games played I think it's sad. I do think the change to gold is annoying, as someone who enjoys pushing multiple characters to gold and can generally do so in much less than 100 games played (much less won) this is a huge turn off.
  6. S4 bastion memes ftw. At least solos were still (sometimes) fun back then.
  7. Obviously, my point is that most of the top 3 players would not qualify in either group or solo ranked for their top 3 titles; instead the you would be giving a top 3 title to the #24 or #27 or #77 player of that class...
  8. No way dude, neither PT or leth Op are an issue: Double VG + Ruffian Scoundrel: https://www.twitch.tv/aqrius/clip/StrongPiliableMooseSquadGoals Leth Op tactical shenanigans: https://i.gyazo.com/a6d13ecbe10b5746edf392a40787431c.gif
  9. If you look at the solos leaders board from last season this is going to be an issue in both solos and group ranked. Looking at solos: Snipers:#24 sniper in solos would get a top 3 title. Jugg: #27 Jugg would get a top 3 Sin - #35 Sorc- Actually one of the top 3 would get a top 3! Vanguard: #77.... Mando: #28 Operative: One top 3 would actually get top 3, then we jump to #8 and #11 Most players on the front page of each class are no where near 200 wins. Maybe we should just change it to: "Top 3 spammers."
  10. No, Grizz taught me how to Mando RP so that's all I do now o.O
  11. It's almost like you have zero reading comprehension skills, I literally started this whole conversation about solo vs grouped ranked by stating that you need a massive pool of players for solo ranked ELO to simply work due to the extreme RNG nature of the mode. Now let me respond to your example, S1 was the best season by far but that was more to do with the fact that teams/players could hide on smaller servers and avoid getting crushed by the "big dogs;" by the end of S1 group ranked on Bastion was dominated by 1-3 teams and most people queue dodged them, POT5 was dominated by 1-2 teams that most people dodged... then low and behold 2 of the bastion teams transferred to POT5 and literally farmed the server to the point that most nights it was those two bastion teams playing vs each other... Solo ranked on POT5 started off with a bang, but very quickly went to **** as a majority of the player base abandoned the game; hell after ~11pm if you queued imp side you were almost always going to be paired vs a pub side queue sync with a hybrid tank and hybrid healer, it was a literal **** show; on some smaller servers by the end of the season it became a struggle to get consistent solo ranked pops... and this was in the most active season the game has ever experienced. Swtor's ranked scene has always had low participation levels, from pre-season ranked 8's to season 11, and this has always hampered the ability of the ELO system to properly function; there were barely enough consistently active players in one pool for the ELO system to function properly in S1, do you really think it's functional now when you have 250-1000 non-consistent players in a given ranked pool?
  12. I think you just made my point for me... 1943 unique players "actively" (and getting 10 wins is a pathetic baseline for being "active") participating in solo ranked would be an extremely low amount of players, 250-500 is literally the game mode on life support. Edit: Yes, they're both equally dead because it takes zero organization or social skills to queue for solo ranked; you should never expect participation in organized group content to remotely equal participation in ad hoc ad content.
  13. You can't reference character participation data and use it to make an argument for how alive/dead a game mode is when multiple characters can represent one player.
  14. Characters does not equal players... I had 70 max level characters in 5.0 across three servers.... with how easy it is to alt in this game you simply cannot equate character participation to player participation.
  15. Funny, I played roughly a hundred group ranked matches on NA last season and that was with a 5 month break to play FF14, many of my friends who stayed longer played more and I know for a fact that the Lukewarm group played hundreds, if not into the thousands of group ranked matches; I also played solo ranked on SS, SF, and DM (before I swapped ISPs), solo ranked on both NA servers was a joke outside of the first 1-2 weeks. For a ranked game mode to be relevant, esp. one that uses an ELO system to match two 4 man teams comprised of individual players, you need an exceptionally large pool of potential players for the "ranked" portion of game mode to have meaning ; if you filter out the passer-bys, the conquest players, the trolls, the auto global newbs who never get better, and the win-traders/bots/throwers you're going to end up with an extremely small and pathetic population of actual solo ranked players on both NA servers. Getting high rating in solo ranked has more to do with how willing you are to throw yourself into the meat grinder repeatedly than it does with how skilled you are... ranked should be a reflection of skill, not games played... unless you think that a clicking, keyboard turning meme of a mara/sentinel that got farmed so hard in a single night of attempting to play group ranked that they never tried again legitimately deserves to even have a chance to get a top 3 title.... DM is considered the last bastion of solo ranked because it has enough relevant players that you can actually get decent games when people are not trolling; hell I would say that many of the "top tier" solo players on NA would get stomped by the mid-tier players on EU and I am 100% an NA player (my ping is extremely unstable on DM, even with a VPN). Finally, none of this has anything to do with topic on hand; regardless of how PT players perform in quad dps solo ranked matches (and if you look at my initial posts I specifically stated that pyro's performance in 4 dps matches would be extremely comp dependent) the brawler set bonus still needs to be nerfed/re-worked. TLDR:: Solo ranked is as irrelevant as group ranked NA solo ranked is literally an inbred extremely small group of players Participation numbers are extremely padded by non pvpers
×
×
  • Create New...