First 20min of the game ran into my first bug, talking to Liara my head did an exorcist thing following her little info drone thing.... and quest breaking bugs all over the place as well as mission objectives failing to update, having me run around the same area thinking I missed something... this game is a mess, certainly reinforces my belief that Bioware loves their bugs; and I hear some ppl cant even import their ME2 characters into ME3. On top of all that, seems a bunch of areas had been compacted and almost feels as if the areas they made pitch black were just to save their own butt cheeks in failing to put content. Granted the battles are alot faster, scanning much more streamlined, and gameplay similar to Dragonage in gaining the galaxy's favor to help you which I enjoy.... just so many cons, so many that I can't even say I like this game atm, hope they patch alot of the bugs soon... First 20min of the game and I see a major bug.... my assumption, the eyes and head were set to track the info bot but failed to re-track Liara afterwards, resulting in a backwards- to sidewards head with eyes rolled in the back of your skull.... eh, well, paid 60 dollars for this game plus 10 more for extra content, for that much money I think I'm entitled to rant for a bit

No, I just don't hold George Lucas' word with any credibility to dictate who is more powerful simply because I started the engine. And I wasn't the first to state fanboy, then said it as a reply after you used the word fanboy, you put the words in my mouth. But what I was conveying was, your canon, is taken because of what he said in an interview, it isn't written law; you can worship him all you wish, doesn't make him "not senile" Though he got the ball rolling, I won't give him complete credit on anything, since he doesn't deserve it. And it's dreadful because it validated his argument to your disapproval in the fact you can come up with maybe excuses for those inconsistencies, or do you truly believe Lucas had intended? This is pointless, you're strapped to Lucas' back like a Yoda backpack

lol, that's funny since I've stated before your defending this as if I said your deity was imperfect. I'm not whining, and ofcourse you mean to be rude, can't take the high road after taking the low road for the last few pages. Think your insults started with, "obviously, you've never watched the films"... then it was, "fanboy" I believe or something of that nature. Besides, his credibility is shot, and your just a follower... say everything you like, but its obvious Sith are more powerful, and credibility is everything, Lucas has little to none now; but ppl still follow others with no credibility, look at the ppl who follow Michael Moore, or Manson

Nah, Im staying here, because George Lucas is an idea man, not a good director, not a good writer, he's stated these facts in an interview. And the fact he doesn't wish to allow anyone to have a character more powerful than Sidious or Luke, is the equivalent to a child taking his toys away and not letting anyone play with them... and once again, for a person who's contributed probably less than a percent or two to the total lore of the series, you put alot of empasis on a money grubber's statements

Eh, yet again your missing my point, and doubt you'd ever get it... George Lucas though the creator, is hardly a credible source based upon his constant changing of canon, contradictory statements during interviews, and inconsistencies he caused in creating the prequels; I don't need to sort out anything, think you need to get your head out of the sand

Now Sith are a cancer?.... who's not biased here? lol. When there is light there is always dark, you are working with a lopsided scale lady. Anakin brings balance to the force by killing all the Jedi in the temple, 2 Jedi, 2 Sith.... then he fulfills the next part of the prophecy, to destroy the Sith, he does this. But the balance meant was when he killed all the Jedi. In EP 1, Mace Windu says "You mean the one who will bring balance to the force, you believe it's this boy?" nothing was said about destroying the Sith. It was only in ep 3 did they tack on to destroy the Sith. Those two things though together in a sentence are separate things, He brought balance to the force and destroyed the Sith, eventually.

That's true, but like I said... when watching a film, I doubt you normally would have a reference manual on hand to help you understand some of the mistakes; ofcourse, normally an average viewer wouldn't care... but if you make movies based on the audience not caring if something makes sense or is consistent, they won't even bother eventually; point is, the average viewer wouldn't reference, "Oh, he meant the battle of Ruusan" they wouldn't care. These are movies first, cult following second.... and the fact the excuse was made "after" the film, holds no standing in explaining anything except them covering their butts

Don't know why, it's just ppl like you, who refuse to believe Lucas can do no wrong, will give him absolute credibility in Star Wars lore.... I highly doubt if you asked him the names of the Solo children, he would know... nor would he care I think

That's true, but alot of things, you don't see the first time; but when you do realize it... your like (the viewer)... huh? That isn't right...... and start asking yourself... "was this a mistake?"

1 generation is roughly 20 years, which would mean 20000 years, not 1000 years, that's significant... still that's my point; It's a film, a film should stand alone, you don't have to read Lord of the Rings to figure out inconsistencies reasons for inconsistencies for one film to another, to my knowledge there are none

I didn't say insult him, him being inconsistent in his films is a fact that could be reinterpreted however you wish the excuse to be. I never believed that being critical, or pointing out inconsistencies, or critiquing... was considered an insult. Simply pointing out that his credibility shouldn't be absolute since all the "inconsistencies" in his films has to be interpreted by the fans as Obi Wan was lying, or having to source facts or reasons from a novel. But I suppose Lucas is beyond critique right?

And Im sure we got all that from the movie right?.... Im starting to wonder if all the literature is just to fill in the mistakes Lucas made making the prequels

Nope, they're absolutely correct, you just don't wish to see it... I find this debate is like as if Im pointing out a specific religion's Deity isn't a perfect being... point out any imperfections, and it's "raise the floodgates, man your posts, they wont take us without a fight." Is it so hard not to give Lucas absolute credibility, especially now? With all these obvious inconsistencies you must make excuses for him?

Im not being malicious about anything, Im saying he shouldn't be the end all be all source of credibility when he says, Luke is the strongest Jedi in the Universe, or Sidious was the strongest Sith; Im not being malicious, you feel Im threatening his credibility and your being defensive about it Plus, I wont make excuses for his mistakes either

Obi-Wan: I have something here for you. Your father wanted you to have this when you were old enough, but your uncle wouldn't allow it. He feared you might follow old Obi-Wan on some damn fool idealistic crusade like your father did. Source http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076759/quotes On that note, Obi Wan said 1000 generations the Jedi Knights have been the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic. Palpatine said in the prequels, I will not allow this Republic that stood for a 1000 years be split in two..... 1000 generations or 1000 years....? Suppose you'll make an excuse for that too?