I played three betas for ToR and knew it was gonna be weak. I've played GW2 for a little bit and the combat alone is worth the buy.

1. I am a MMO vet with up to 8 played. 2. Um....yes....yes it did. Wait....you seriously believe this? WoW launched with raids....i was there. 3. This game is for bads, soccar moms, and disney kids.

You mean the guy that said a bunch of people beating on the same monster isn't heroic?

If they spent as much time and money on actual game play and a decent engine, the game would actually be good.

Oh how you fanboys need anything you can get to convince yourselves that the rubbish you're playing is good.

Yes i said it and i'll defend it to the end. Gameplay is the reason people play video games. Otherwise they would be watching animated shorts.

No. Its garbage for an MMO. I'll play more DDO before this again.

1. I had hoped they fixed the combat from over a year and a half ago. 2. Thought there would be another reason for "choice" other than consmetic 3. Its not Warcraft 4. Game play is the reason people play video games. And technically i'm not here.......i'm every where (other than subbed) while i wait for D3, Heart of the Swarm, and GW2

ROFL. Sure. Fantasy land.

Ive had a ton of consoles since the intellivision. I've played most of the MMOs out today. I don't need to be an engineer to tell you that a ford festiva is crap. Your logic is an appeal to authority. Too bad it sucks. If you really REALLY think the story in this game is "good" then you don't know what a good story is. However, perhaps you are right, maybe i am "spoiled". I graduated with a folklore minor so maybe i am spoiled. But lets use your own logic.......the first super mario had maybe one paragraph of story narrative and i played that game for hours and hours. One quick question....guess why it didn't need a lot of "story"? Because it was a good game for its time and didn't need it. But with ToR, story is the focal point and everything else was an afterthought including combat responsiveness. The problem is, video games have a thing where combat responsiveness is required and the irony? Story sucks. Like i said, a bad WB show. (if there is such a thing as a good WB show. This is more like Disney star wars. Its a good game for people that don't read, baddies, and beginner MMO players.

Your name alone is enough to know you live in a fantasy land.

1. I know i could do a better job 2. Dont advertise a "story" if its not a good one. 3. You used entertaining. Now you get subjective. Watching a fat person fall down stairs is entertaining however i dont need a writer to tell that story.

Burger king makes good burgers. See the difference?

Look at my join date. You can watch someone else' story or create your own. A dialogue wheel does NOT equal "good story". Its a cosmetic replacement for game play. And a tad bit more on the "story"...... Have you ever read a classic novel? Or how about someone who just writes exceptionally well...i.e. Christopher Hitchens? If you're going to advertise a game for its "great story" make sure you have "great writers". Standing around exchanging a dialogue for 30 seconds is NOT a "great story". That kind of story has no depth, character development, story archs, etc. This is worse than a WB show....for clarification..... The WB is to good stories like crunch berries are to fruit.

Rolling an alt does not equal end game content. Furthermore....most of the planets are boring and linear, going through them again is hardly an option.