This. I'd only add that even when hardcore players aren't playing games they are often thinking about it. The number of casual gamers far outweighs the number of hardcore gamers and as a result games are primarily designed for the casual audience.

There is a list of datacron achievements in the codex. Your codex also keeps track of how many datacrons are left on each planet. To view this simply open the codex and then select the planets tab and a planet. Then hit the little magnifying glass icon to reveal all the achievements available to you on that planet including how many you have already discovered.

And how exactly do you know that in this "advanced state of the universe" that they have not discovered a way to create a material that looks identical to leather (and perhaps even more durable) without the sacrifice of a beast?

I can understand you simply suggesting or requesting they fix it to your standards, but to act like this is a cancel worthy thing is a gross exaggeration and just makes you come off as silly and quite frankly childish.

I've already created and am well into levels on a number of alts. So yeah once the new character creation options get added to the legacy system I'd like to be able to recustomize the look of my characters.

Team Fortress 2 = F2P. It must be a failure as well. Did these games fail to achieve the level of success attained by WoW? Definitely. Did they fail to live up to the expectations of their developers/publishers? Most likely. Did they fail to make any money and achieve some level of success? I doubt it .

Huh? You realize a baby is alive before the mother gives birth, right? Let's look at the actual quote from RotJ. Luke: Leia, do you remember your mother? Your real mother? Princess Leia: Just a little bit. She died when I was very young. Luke: What do you remember? Princess Leia: Just... images really. Feelings. Luke: Tell me. Princess Leia: She was... very beautiful. Kind, but sad. Why are you asking me this? Is it possible that inside the womb of her mother, Leia received images and feelings of her mother via the force before her death that seared into Leia's brain for the rest of her life? Other than a fully developed brain it's not any different than Anakin getting images that his mother is in pain all the way out in the outer rim of the galaxy or seeing Padme's future death. On the topic of seeing the future it's also possible that at 3-4 years of age or something Leia could have had visions of Padme from the past as well and these are the memories she has in RotJ of her mother. Of course next you'll say, "why doesn't Luke have this memory as well?" It's either because Luke simply doesn't remember or he never made the same connection Leia did. If this is just totally unacceptable to you then you are left to believe that Leia was talking about Breha Organa, which can still fit. I bet you could find someone that considers their foster parents to be their real father and mother. They may not be the person's biological father or mother, but they are every bit as real of a father or mother to them and would label them as such.

Let's sue Blizzard while we're at it.

How exactly do you figure out who to penalize for this and not chance accidentally penalizing an innocent that's in the area, trying to play normally as this is going on? And did you ever take part in any trading of capture points? Kill trading is not really any different.

Not really. I sympathize more with a tank's inability to see target of target than a healer's because a healer can easily set the tank as their focus target then use the focus modifier key to heal them at any time while keeping the boss targeted and maintaining view of their cast bar. The focus frame is not perfect as it overlaps the enemy cast bar a bit, but it's definitely usable and once the UI scale/opacity changes come out this issue should be fixed. If you use the focus frame to heal your tank then all you have to do is target his target by pressing ctrl+f. (thanks Kyler, I setup my assist target/focus target keys on f key with modifiers, but somehow never realized what ctrl+f did)

Your blanket generalization is wrong. It would be like me saying, only bad players with a lot of time on their hands would ever want gear based progression in PVP. Which in no way says that I expected the game not to have gear progression. And last time I checked MMOs or even just games in general can change greatly over time. It would not be hard to remove gear based progression from PVP in SWTOR. I agree.

And I"m sure that's the case with many people, but surely you are not saying that it's impossible that a good player would want to change the system. When did I say I bought this game not expecting it to be gear based? I think even in my last post I basically said that the gear based progression in PVP was not a deal breaker. I'll gladly offer my suggestions, but they really don't need me since there are many games without gear based progression that they can research.

I wasn't even talking about criticisms about things that were broken. I was talking about criticisms about things of a more personal nature that you dislike. Perhaps you dislike the story and felt it could be stronger if such and such happened. Or you didn't like the pacing of the game. Etc. It's true the game is gear based, but it doesn't have to be. I don't see what gear based progression in PVP adds. I'm obviously willing to play a game with such a system, but I'm always going to question its place when I don't see the point and can think of better systems.

So a Sage/Sorcerer does not have to be on the move? If that's the case then when a melee class fights a Sage/Sorcerer they should just be able to close the distance and then just stand in place as they trade blows since apparently a Sage/Sorcerer doesn't have to do things on the move in order to survive in PVP.

So I take it you don't ever have any criticisms of any games you play because you are one of these so called "good adaptable" players, right? And anyone that continues to play the game is going to be forced to adapt, but that doesn't mean they aren't going to long for something better.