I don't know what to think. Either half of you people are lying, or you are stone-cold insane. There is no fair fight between a level 50 and someone less than half their level. Period. End of story. They have too many resources at their command, between high level abilities and talent specs. If you've played at level 50 and you feel you're evenly matched with a level 11 character, then you are the worst PvP player ever. I have had higher levels fight me one on one in Warzones, a couple of times they would even just stand there for several moments while I slowly whittled away their hit points only to stun me and then destroy me in moments without effort. Between that, and how impossible it is to face an entire team of the same, I will not be participating in Warzones until I reach 50. Go ahead and call me a terribad, but I think . On a secondary note, I'm curious what you people really think is wrong with cross-server Warzones? I hear all the time that it will destroy the community of a server, but I have to ask, what are you talking about? Are you talking about World of Warcraft? World of Warcraft never had communities. EverQuest had communities. Star Wars Galaxies had communities. I made it all the way through three or so years of World of Warcraft, and I never once made a friend online. I think you're delusional if you think there's ever going to be a community, personally. So far the only thing having a single server Warzone community has given me is a burning hatred for "Brobafett." Seriously, I want to tear his nametag off and beat him to death with it. Listen to reason, Bioware. Make Warzones worth playing again, regardless of level.

Okay. Once again, you don't have to use Twitter as a social network. It is a completely viable option to use Twitter solely to keep updated feeds on anything you're interested in. Stephen Reid is using his own personal Twitter to keep a lot of us appraised of what's going on. It's easier for him to handle probably, considering the massive influx of posts on the forums. It's easier for people to ask him questions and get responses. This is a bonus feature, an extra. It's not, in my opinion, something we're necessarily entitled to. You can't really protest social media. It's sort of like the radio and television. It's one of those things that we as a society need to learn to find meaningful ways to incorporate into our lives before it can do the harm you're worried about. Not using Twitter in the way I described, not taking control of it and making it yours, is just as much a failure to help social media evolve.

Use Twitter. I don't mean to sound like a jerk, but I have plenty of friends on the "lawltwittersux," bandwagon. I don't care what the reason, if you want an up to the minute feed for something provided on Twitter, than sign up an account and Follow it. Nothing is forcing you to follow celebrities or anyone you don't want to follow. Nothing forces you to Tweet.

You realize Twitter is a superior platform for these rapid-paced up-to-the-minute updates, right? Sure, they could put a Shoutbox on the forums or something, but there isn't one currently. I'd rather have Twitter tell me he's posting then stare at the forums like it's the '00's continuously hitting "Refresh." Seriously.