Yeah, without a name, a legacy only kinda half exists, and the things listed by @Ominovin are in the "kinda half" that doesn't exist.

'Sweird, the only times I had problems with that boss were the very first time I went there, the same week it was released, when nobody knew how it worked, and the time I was playing as a Shadow Tank (Kinetic Combat), which I didn't know well. Stay out of circles and whatever as much as possible, and kill the adds that aren't "Tank Droid" as soon as they appear. And hit the boss itself until it falls over. And give Rania Temple gifts to raise her Influence rank. (I k'bah to look up which is the best gift type to give, but I think it's either Imperial Memorabilia or Military Doodads.

Your Caps Lock key is faulty.

Careful: 200K per piece, not 200K for the whole set.

Meh...

the *max* is irrelevant. What matters is the number of strongholds that are actually reachable, which is more than 10, but all you actually need is a vendor, not *that* vendor.

Short answer: "No". Download *any* other TOTP authenticator. I use "OTP Auth", but the officially-recommended alternative is Google Authenticator.

It's an oddity, but sort-of(1) known on the forums. Basically, if no member-character(2) of the guild logs in for at least 28 days, the guild becomes completely inactive, at which point(3) its name is unlocked, and available for other guilds to use. If that happens, you will see a weird guild name (all caps, I believe), and it might be that some other guild has taken the name either when it was created or (later) when it was renamed. (1) That is, hardly known at all, but not completely unknown either. (2) Everything to do with guilds is per-character, not per-legacy. (3) Or possibly 28 days later. Nobody has done enough experimentation to find out which, or if someone has, the results haven't been posted on the forums..

Hmm. OK. That makes a kind of sense. Thanks.

I'd pay at least a bit of money to *prevent* the studio from building such an app. That might sound a bit extreme, but the effect of the app on the P2P economy would be ... distressing.

Be careful about the difference between "deconstruction" and "destruction". The same panel is used for *both* of these (at the same time), but there's a catastrophic difference between them.

It's worth noting that people have been asking for this since forever, and the studio (both of them) has stuck to BioWare's stated (way back when) policy of "no" on this subject.

And there's already something like that in-game, where if you play a character from level 1 to level 50 in a particular species, and it unlocks using that species on all other origin stories.(1)(2)(3) So sure, some other things would be interesting. (1) Doesn't do anything for Cyborgs because they are already available for all origins. (2) Zabraks are available for all origins, but separated with red Zabs only on Impside and brown Zabs only on Pubside. Reaching level 50 unlocks red Zabs on Pubside origins and brown Zabs on Impside origins. (3) Humans are available for all origins, so playing one to level 50 gives all the characters on your legacy, including the human that got there, a +100 Presence bonus.

It's the *second* class (er, combat style), not the *secondary* one. "Secondary" implies that it's somehow less important than the other one, which it isn't. I have at least one character who plays exclusively using her second style (because I couldn't reprogram her first style when 7.0 came out), and I see no reason to justify calling it "secondary". And I want to be able to rechoose the *first* style on more than one character. And there are multiple possible reasons for them making it permanent: Eliminating/reducing FOTM-based style shuffle as the class balance is altered. (There are other ways to manage that, notably having a substantial cooldown (three or four months, that sort of thing) before we could use another.) Whatever the unspecified "technical issues" were that prevented us from choosing a new "first" combat style on characters created before 7.0 came out. This might count as a "major coding hasstle[sic]", I suppose.

Fair point, although other times I've seen that suggestion, it seemed like folks wanted her to be not blonde.