Jump to content

Andge

Members
  • Posts

    174
  • Joined

Reputation

10 Good
  1. Agreed. Star Wars Star Wars is the films. The rest if a mess; parts of EU are good, others are horrible. But overall, EU is a messy, sad abomination.
  2. A boring and obvious answer, I know, but can't be anyone else but Luke Skywalker. Of Siths, it's Darth Sidious.
  3. To be honest, I think the whole franchise is degenerating. There is something rotten about the whole EU which I fear will actually be the end of SW one day. It's degenerating into this commercial, superficial, extreme, every-thing-has-to-be-put-into-boxes-thing (and SWTOR hasn't made things better re the last boxes part). SW is moving further and further away from what made it SW in the first place. In a way, I wish they had just stopped with the original trilogy and a few NES games. On the other hand, I'm like the next fanboy who wants more more more until the abomination has become so big it tilts over and explodes.
  4. I think either I would be a farmer living on a peaceful Republic planet. Or I would be a Jedi Guardian fighting Sith all day long in Warzones. All or nothing, baby
  5. No, absolutely. I've always said that George's word must be law in SW. I'm just curious about where he actually says that. Though I wonder how C-3PO could now about this in Attack of the Clones
  6. I don't recall that. Where does he say that?
  7. Where does it say that? I bet what you're going to give me now is actually your interpretation of events, not canon.
  8. G-CANON does not state that Sidious was toying with Yoda. Repeating your interpretation does not magically turn it into a fact.
  9. I've already addressed the laughing part. Go back and read.
  10. Point out a fact that I have ignored. And no, the movie and novel does not show Sidious toying with Yoda. They show him winning. Not toying.
  11. As you've said before. Which therefore makes it facts. No. Hate to brake it to you. Your word is not law. The fact that you have "said something before" does no make it so. Sidious wanting to make Yoda suffer instead of killing him immediately if he could, is your interpretation. As I've said before.
  12. But it's not a fact, man. Can't you see it? You're presenting your own interpretation as a fact XD
  13. This is simply getting ridiculous. You claim now to know so much about Sith psychology that your interpretation of a Sith's act can be claimed to be facts? Dude, you're the most far out person I've ever met.
  14. Now you also present this subjective interpretation as being a fact! Nowhere does it say that Sidious didn't want to kill Yoda. Nowhere! It is your interpretation. Please be honest about that. My interpretation? Not matter how much Sidious would enjoy to torture Yoda, he would never risk Yoda getting away if he had the chance to kill him. Therefore Sidious would strike immediately if he had the chance to kill Yoda.
×
×
  • Create New...